Upcoming Releases & General Update
Added 2021-10-25 00:57:39 +0000 UTCHi guys,
Sorry there was no episode on Friday. We have the Mikhaila episode done and dusted and it is in the editing bay but due to various technical snafus and actual job demands we couldn't get it out as planned. It should be finished today or tomorrow and we will release as soon as it is ready.
Then... some good news. We have another two episodes that we will hopefully drop together on Friday. These are the mystery episode we have been teasing. I don't want to spoil the surprise but it is a topic we get asked about a lot so it will be interesting to hear people's feedback. Matt and I will probably do a Patreon episode at some point to discuss the episodes afterwards, as we have some thoughts too.
The following week, we will release the edited version of the Annie Kelly interview, which some of you will have already heard. So that's the next three weeks.
You may also remember that both David Fuller and Chris Williamson wanted to invoke their 'right to respond'. I (Chris) have now spoke to both of them and we are hoping to schedule those soon. The conversations were interesting and I think they both bring quite nuanced points that are worth discussing. We should record both of them in November, though there is a chance we will record with David this week (schedule permitting). Guru-wise we plan to cover Brene Brown next to stick with our 'season of self-help' theme.
So that's all for now. Lots of stuff to come and apologies for the delay. Real life has been a killer recently... in part because I am teaching six courses this semester.
Anyway thanks all for your patience and support! It is greatly appreciated.
Comments
Man that was painful the way he kept talking over you guys. IDK, I've never heard him so defensive. He's usually eloquent and on point, but the talking over, having vague answers, or deflecting by always bringing it back to semantics it sounded almost like the way some Republicans debate. Chris showed far more patience than I would've in such a situation. And I know Matt didn't say much, but what he did say was poignant.
Cesare, But Def Not A Borgia
2021-11-04 06:35:18 +0000 UTCReally looking forward to the Brene Brown episode! From my very glancing familiarity with what she puts out I always imagined I would be a fan if I looked closer -- quite interesting to see her make the Gurus list. Should be fascinating to see the results of giving her material the Chris and Matt going over ;).
Tom Allison
2021-10-29 09:18:19 +0000 UTCI suppose that they were "popular amongst the undergrads" may already be a sign -- I'm not sure that is a usual situation for TA's -- but the woman who described this to me is very far from someone I would imagine appreciating any guru-ish-ness in her science heroes...
Tom Allison
2021-10-29 08:36:49 +0000 UTCOh, and one last thought while I’m on the subject of guru-capture by audiences - I was at UM while Bret and Heather were doing their PhDs there and teaching a lot of courses (as graduate students do). While I didn’t have first hand experience with them that I know of, I have friends who were undergrads in biology and have since gone on to successful academic careers and *they* are quite chagrined that Heather and Bret have taken things the way they have - they were quite popular amongst the undergrads and thought of as on the hard-nosed end of the scientific thinking spectrum… “What the hell happened to them?” is a line from recent communication regarding their recently published book. So, they may well be a good model for exploring how gurus as well as audiences can be misled by the dynamics between the two.
Tom Allison
2021-10-28 10:49:52 +0000 UTC“ We don't take ourselves seriously enough for that.” I wish we could figure out how to bottle whatever this is…
Tom Allison
2021-10-28 05:57:49 +0000 UTCThere needs to be a combined heart and wink emoticon…
Tom Allison
2021-10-28 05:54:48 +0000 UTCAnyone with an audience is impacted by the reaction of the audience to the content and we do inevitably notice how people respond but I do not think we are in any danger of becoming gurus. We both have a fairly healthy appreciation for our own limitations and personality quirks and are under no illusions that we deserve a Nobel or wider public recognition. It's probably a mixture of our cultural backgrounds and individual personalities but consistent piss taking tends to deflate egos and I think we have a reasonable perspective on our place within the podcast/online ecosystem. It probably helps that we have other interests/careers/family stuff that keeps us from getting overly identified. Matt and I also approach the podcast as primarily something that is fun for us to do and that we are happy to put our name to. That might mean that at times we release content or take choices that annoy some of our audience. That helps with reducing feelings of 'capture'! Overall, we are certainly not immune to the online dynamics and psychological rewards doled out by positive feedback but I think there is unlikely to be a late season heel turn into guru-hood. We don't take ourselves seriously enough for that.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-10-28 03:56:45 +0000 UTCThere are also three of us who work on the files so sometimes we have to coordinate efforts and/or wait for someone to add something/adjust a segment, etc. We definitely do edit out stuff, but most of it is verbal tics, technical issues, or too long detours.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-10-28 03:46:53 +0000 UTCHmmm... Preparation depends on the content. Usually we both listen separately then I (Chris) clip the content. This takes time mechanically but has been speeded up a lot by using Descript. The total amount is hard to guess because it depends on the amount of clips but its probably in the region of 1-3 hrs in total, not counting initial listening time. For post-production for each hour produced it is probably about 2 hrs of editing time.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-10-28 03:44:57 +0000 UTCInteresting! And everything you mention does line up with the content. Being a victim does not prevent you from becoming an exploiter/abuser so yeah... depressing!
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-10-28 03:42:04 +0000 UTCUm, I did just realize that one form of innoculation may be having .05% the audience size :). (Though, then, what does *the quality* of the audience do to that calculation?)
Tom Allison
2021-10-27 18:00:36 +0000 UTCGood point on the authority hang-over of the written word from a time when it was costlier to produce… Is that a common observation in analyzing the dynamics of the Internet, or is it something you have formulated for yourself? (Apologies - I like the point, but I know I am not around such meta-conversations much these days ;)).
Tom Allison
2021-10-27 16:23:47 +0000 UTCYou're on to something Tom. There is a weird authority bias around the written word, even in the internet age, that is a bit of a hangover from the days of more controlled publications. Add to that the extra affirmation around upvotes or likes of general interactions, and it is easy to see how people start believing in their own bullshit. No one is totally immune, but there's enough civility self-awareness and around these parts that makes me think those of us on this patreon, and Matt and Chris as well, probably are at least partially vaccinated, if not double jabbed (to labour a metaphor).
Charlotte Goodall
2021-10-27 15:55:55 +0000 UTCHere's a heavy thought: one of your guests (I think David Pizarro, but could have been Stuart Ritchie or Robert Wright? Then again, also could have been Conspirituality guy - Matthew Remski? - I don't necessarily listen in order ;)) talked about the potential for a pattern of Guru capture *by the audience* - wherein normal folk are slowly turned into Gurus via the intoxication of being fawned over/responded to by their audience... Do you guys ever worry about this? Do you do anything to innoculate yourselves against it? I ask in part because I am noticing my own noticing when my comments get upvoted on Reddit and how much I pay attention/get a charge in the micro-interactions surrounding them -- at least in part because I find your content so cool. It makes me wonder what it must be like to be on the other side of those interactions, as the creators, and whether it is possible to escape the pull/not get hooked on it? It makes me think that the manipulation and microtising of feedback that online social media has given us might not be much more behind the rise of this current crop of gurus than one might otherwise think -- and whether there are ways to participate but avoid the worst effects of it? Is staying sharp and critical enough? It reminds me a bit too much of the future drug-addict bragging about how she can handle the interaction with whatever her substance of choice happens to be...
Tom Allison
2021-10-27 11:25:47 +0000 UTCYou are managing to produce some truly entertaining content on some very challenging topics. I am very curious about this tidbit: would you be willing to share how much pre- and post-production work goes into producing 2 hours of this content? I know there were technical issues with getting this online -- and those should count and are often ignored in planning/appreciation -- but I am wondering how many hours it takes to get all those clips, how much planning there is for your discussions and how much review there is to splice together AND EDIT OUT POTENTIAL FAUX PAS (or do you do that, at all? ;)). You may set your playback to 2x, but this all still seems really labor intensive. I would understand if you want to keep the sausage making part of the process in house, but I am curious.
Tom Allison
2021-10-27 11:05:02 +0000 UTCI enjoyed the Mikhalia Peterson episode and had a few observations: you treat her with compassion, which is admirable. However, I think you underestimate the depth of the eating disorder that she expresses. Orthorexia, while not yet in the DSM, is widely accepted as a damaging and subtle eating disorder that involves fear of foods that are deemed “unhealthy “, and attribution of all ailments to “eating incorrectly”. She characterises this essentially. It is a psychological disorder that is incredibly difficult to address and these “diet cult” characters are pushing people deeper into disorder and distress. There is absolutely a crossover into other kinds of medical pseudoscience here: promoting the thought patters that illness is a direct result of “not eating/behaving/believing in an way approved by the belief system. I’m not quite as charitable towards her as I see her as both a victim of this but also preying on those who are vulnerable to the same issues.
Charlotte Goodall
2021-10-27 08:19:29 +0000 UTCI loved the debate over the evil chuckling clown, Scott Adams. I found myself agreeing with both of you. Yes, it is good that he is willing to be a heterodox right wing nut, but he’s still a right wing nutter. By the way, Chris, PDX is the nickname for Portland, Oregon (it’s the airport code). Home to our favorite Weinstein bro.
DavidtheG
2021-10-27 06:40:05 +0000 UTCThe shoutout to Slipknot was well received.
Grammaticus Gore
2021-10-27 02:40:33 +0000 UTCListening now and cringing the whole way through.
Helen Polemis
2021-10-27 00:42:43 +0000 UTCGreat stuff guys!
A Mug's Game
2021-10-25 22:06:31 +0000 UTCSeriously... 6 separate courses? Or 6 sections of the same course?
Alex A
2021-10-25 19:02:00 +0000 UTCYou are telling me.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-10-25 07:09:03 +0000 UTCHoly shit, 6 courses is insane
Nick Brouwer
2021-10-25 07:03:07 +0000 UTC
