Should Harry Potter become king or does he create a Wizengamot to govern Scotland?
Added 2023-12-06 18:30:16 +0000 UTCHarry is fast approaching becoming a historical figure with a fake name and a fake story and still ends up becoming the catalyst behind the formation of a nation.
So, should he go straight for kingship or decentralise his power for greater involvement and growth of wizarding society?
Comments
Imagine the fun when he pops back with a dragon familiar and a founder as his fiancé
Derek james
2023-12-19 06:19:10 +0000 UTCWhen he returns an is “pulled back” it should be with Rowena and the Red Queen as his bonds carry them with him.
Derek james
2023-12-19 06:18:03 +0000 UTCHow long is Harry staying though? Wasn’t the plan that he would be stranded for a year in the past, will that be enough for establishing a nation & how is his relationship with Rowena gonna work out?
TyrantGod
2023-12-06 22:22:43 +0000 UTCHe should be king. Democracy is always corrupt. It's better to be the one making the rules than have a bunch of people who can be bribed doing it. If he wants a council to help him, that's what servants are for.
Darkanlan
2023-12-06 19:10:42 +0000 UTCIf possible couldn't there be a sort of noble council that runs most of the kingdom but they answer to the an overriding monarch. This way they could keep each other in check from corruption but have an overriding authority if needed. Think dark council of the sith during the old Republic of star wars with the emperor as its head
Callum Runchman
2023-12-06 18:57:15 +0000 UTC
