Katas
Added 2018-03-19 01:41:49 +0000 UTCmore line work done
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bhkwzwijme702z9/AAB71qkGP8Y4ug0LKFaZSfOJa?dl=0
Comments
roger all that. i put down the base colors first to see if that would help but then i realized there is still a lot of work to be done on the structure like you have often pointed out
Hatton Slayden
2018-03-19 22:55:30 +0000 UTCokay let's see: - Face attack. You might want to reconsider the "ass" section as the left ass cheek going under the chin might mean that the panda either has a *very* long belly or has a disjointed hip joint. - Grand meeting. Very good. ๐ - Kata. As far as the pose goes i see no problems i just don't understand what's happening on account of having no perception of the space around them. ๐ Still... looks like a "bonding/love" image and i approve of those. - Leg Stretch, while the pose looks believable, i'd check the muscles involved on the panda's position. Because either she somehow acquired an ultra-thin waist (which does not seem plausible as it looks very normal and consistent with the other images) or for some reason the ass/thigh muscles bulged out for this one image giving her an epic ass out of nowhere. ๐ Got nothing against epic asses, just prefer consistency. ๐คฃ Also i'm "exaggerating for comedic value" here and to (paradoxically) "play it all down", the difference is not eye-shattering, but she does have a lot more muscles in the ass region than in other images. ๐ - Matchup, ๐ค Either she has her feet firmly planted on the man's thigh or the man is holding her via his left thigh that should go under her right thigh as support. The way you structured this image seems to play that last supposition, but you might need a stepping stone smaller than the boulder or have him support himself on the boulder which would hide the leg and thus hide wherรจ he's holding her. It's porn so probably nobody will notice. Also this image... it's very lovely, like it a lot. ๐ - panda speed paint. Meh, can't give you any advice. Almost done, would change nothing. 10/10 would watch again. ๐คฃ๐ - panda speed paint 2. This pose is troubling because while anatomically correct in every aspect, without making it photorealistic it has an high chance of people not understanding that she has the shoulders arched back a lot, and thus the spine looks wrong. I would suggest a correction in the spine by making her seem to have it "less arched". While the pose would then result "stiffer" ... eh... it probably would help. But meh, maybe you can pull it off and even if you cannot it's just 1 image in a porn folio. So few people are probably going to try and tell you the pose is wrong (which it is not, but i've seen people complain for the most absurd idiotic reasons) as they'll be fapping to it. ๐ - upside down. Very good. ๐คฃ๐
Simone Spinozzi
2018-03-19 16:52:09 +0000 UTCWill comment properly once i'm bavk home from work. 15:01 here and i still have to have lunch ๐
Simone Spinozzi
2018-03-19 14:01:20 +0000 UTCAre you seriously excusing yourself for "rambling". Do i have to point at the average length of my comments when i don't have to say anything more than "perfect!๐"? ๐คฃ
Simone Spinozzi
2018-03-19 14:00:04 +0000 UTCdavid tends to find were i need fixing in tails and the genital region. any critiques are welcome and since these are not using 3d trace overs like i have before they are easier to fix. this is a weird thing about me were ia was more resistant to change with 3d paintovers probably because i saw it on the model, now things should be getting a lot more interesting now that i am breaking into traditional methods (again) and pardon my rambling comment
Hatton Slayden
2018-03-19 13:56:18 +0000 UTCI need an emoji of somebody on the floor pounding said floor while laughing. "Pandamoan". *snicker* Anyway. Looks great so far. I'm usually a bad judge of sketches. I tend to think that the art is either too "raw" or still being worked on and i tend to withhold judgement because i just don't know which adjustments you might want to give it. But i've seen at least one guy in here (David Ewell i think? I'm bad at remembering names of people that i don't actually talk much with directly) that seems to get it much better than me and most of his suggestions on the sketches seemed on point.
Simone Spinozzi
2018-03-19 01:55:44 +0000 UTC
