leap of floof
Added 2017-12-08 02:08:49 +0000 UTCalmost done
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sk898qvit542m0g/AACsdoq9ngYtByzqOADTft8ka?dl=0
Comments
This looks absolutly awesome!!!
Maxime Tony
2017-12-09 11:42:23 +0000 UTCok i will work on the queen. as for patreon i am not sure what i can do to help. as far as i know when a person pledges to a level they get access to every post for that level and i have a LOT of posts.
Hatton Slayden
2017-12-08 16:02:50 +0000 UTCok before i proceed with the comments we agreed upon... a bit of a post given the patreon pledge craze ok. So... i just read a blog post. And, as i suspected, this pledge move on Patreon is just a move to make "payments upfront" possible. "Never explain with malice what simple idiocy can explain it." in this case patreon thought that since patrons would want their pledge to last "a month"... :facepalm: they are splitting the payment process into micropayments so, when i said that the "per transaction fee" was identical... apparently i was right, i just did not think that the people at patreon would be as idiotic as to think that people could not hold it together and wait the right moment before pledging or that they could not accept that pledging near the end of a period was going to be detrimental. Basically they are covering their asses for a problem that is not there because it happens too few times and in the meantime they are making life impossible for everybody :facepalm: They think that if people were to be free to pledge at any moment they would pledge more often. :facepalm: I think they think money grows on trees or something. People are more worried about wasting a lot of money very often than "donating to a cause" every now and then as was seen by people pledging at the last moment before collection. So by allowing the "month" to be flexible people will be continuously wasting a lot of money on collection fees. :facepalm: I'm facepalming so hard that i think i'll switch to :headdesk:ing in order to find something softer for my forehead now onto the comments: - Leap of fluff: looks perfect to me! ππ - Pirate Cannon: Wow you went on the full mile with the squirrel lady ππ - Queen's Delight: π€ i think the torso on her right (our left) needs to be shaded a bit more, while geometrically correct, the perception of the image is that the "unseen border" is wider since there is not enough shading to implicate a more pronounced curvature, and this, added to the more normal boob shape (as opposed to the sphere boobs so often seen in many authors) tricks perception in thinking she is wider. It's an optical illusion, given by the stylization, but also very powerful. Basically due to this illusion her torso in my mind seems to extend up to her vertical arm. I'm sure you don't see it because you've already seen the 3d model and you know the correct shading. In this case the shading needs to be "faked" to that of a smaller torso to prevent the illusion. - Sensuous Serpent: looks perfect to me! ππ - Tigress Knows: looks perfect to me! ππ - Vixen Punce: π€ i did not think that something as idiotic as "just" shading the mouse would actually work so well in removing the stylization perceived on the mouse. Looks perfect to me! ππ
Simone Spinozzi
2017-12-08 09:38:41 +0000 UTC
