DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE #29: JABS INJURY Rx PART 3

Ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug used to treat health challenges related to parasitic worms such as intestinal strongyloidiasis (a chronic infection due to low redox), onchocerciasis (called river blindness), and other parasitic infections. It is also approved as a topical treatment for head lice and skin related conditions such as rosacea. Every single disease it works for is associated with low redox states in our mitochondria. It has also been shown to have anti-viral activity against a broad range of viruses as the cites below reveal.

It has been used in a safe manner since 1970s, by over 200 million people worldwide, and its contribution to saving human lifes has been recognized via the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. That is the backround I need you to understand before the bomb comes in the next few paragraphs.

This blog starts with some new ideas for the jabbed. If you took the Pfizer jab you need to pay particular attention to the slide above. The conclusions are paramount. It means that Ivermectin can block the transmission of SV40 into the nucleus. If you can do this it means your incidence of cancer generation should drop. The more jabs you took the more ivermectin you need to consider. Let me be clear. Do not wait to be diagnosed with cancer before you consider using this option. The latest data is becoming crystal clear, the risks of disease far outweigh the risk of the drugs.

Below you will see a chart talking about cancer and ivermectin dosing from Dr. Paul Marik.

THE JABBED UPDATE Rx 

I now believe that new Rx for cancer prevention should read: If you took one jab use the low grade cancer dosing paradigm in the slide above. If you took 2-3 doses of the jab you should use the intermediate grade dosing regimen. If you took 4 more more doses you should use the higher grade dosing regimen to avoid cancer transformation.

Ivermectin has also been shown to control and maintain cell volumes in several paprs and it operates via multiple metabolic pathways. This is advice you'll never get from a centralized MD.

For those fearful this advice is over the edge know this bit of history. According to the scientific literature that anyone can study these days, Ivermectin is one of the drugs standing on top of the list of repurposed drugs in oncology, due to its outstanding potential to fight cancer. Since COVID jabs came out Fauci and the NIH machine have tried to bury these facts.

Indeed, this is a drug that stood out in my research of the scientific literature since 2014. At that time, there was not much information available on Ivermectin application in oncology. This is why i did not talk about it much because there was a paucity of papers I could point to help educate you on these topics. Today that is no longer true due to what the governments did with COVID.

CANCER HISTORY

Throughout the history of oncology research, in both the conventional and alternative cancer research realms, there has been a cause and effect relationship that has been largely ignored. The ability of a cell to divide, whether it be a malignant or non-malignant cell, is highly dependent on cell volume, as well as membrane potential. Apoptosis controls the volume pathways in cells by many mechanisms.

The collagen tensegrity system is piezo and flexoelectric and releases and absorbs light from the sun diurnally,  and this is why cell volume and cancer are related; so when you lose energy and charge in a cell, the cell, mitochondria and nuclear membrane all enlarges.  The temporal sequence of the enlargement is what differs.  Mitochondrial morphology is one of the earliest changes because of changes in how electrons and protons are used in the matrix.

Apoptosis is a programmed cell death that is regulated by mitchondrial networks and genes to maintain cell stability and stable volumes. It can be triggered by two activation pathways: the endogenous endoplasmic reticulum stress/mitochondrial pathway and the exogenous death receptor pathway. These cites below lay that case out.

1. Nagata S. Apoptosis and Clearance of Apoptotic Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:489–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053010.

2. Degterev A., Yuan J. Expansion and evolution of cell death programmes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(5):378–390. doi: 10.1038/nrm2393.

The decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential and the cytochrome c is released from mitochondria into the cytoplasm was detected after the intervention of IVM in Hela cells. Therefore, decentrlaized clinicians can infer that IVM induces apoptosis mainly through the mitochondrial pathway.

IVERMECTIN (IVM) ALSO AFFECT AUTOPHAGY

IVM as an autophagy activator to induce autophagy-dependent death in tumor cells. Autophagy is a lysosomal-dependent form of programmed cell death. Both Apoptosis and autophagy are the only two change programs avaialble to defective mitochondria to change redox potential in an organ. Never forget this critical link. Autophagy utilizes lysosomes to eliminate superfluous or damaged organelles in the cytoplasm to maintain homeostasis and lower heteroplasmy to decrease disease burden in organs with mtDNA mutations via any cause. As mtDNA mutations rise cells swell. As swelling increases so does the appearance of chrnic disease related to COVID jabs.

Autophagy is characterized by double-layered or multilayered vacuolar structures containing cytoplasmic components, which are known as autophagosomes. In recent years, many studies have shown that autophagy is a double-edged sword in tumor development. This means they can be a double edged sword in treating the jabbed injured. A clinician needs to be vigilant with use of this as a prophyllatic. On the one hand, autophagy can help tumors adapt to the nutritional deficiency of the tumor microenvironment, and to a certain extent, protect tumor cells from chemotherapy- or radiotherapy- induced injury.

Programmed cell death mediated by autophagy after IVM intervention and the enhancement of the anticancer efficacy of IVM by regulating autophagy are interesting topics. Intervention with IVM in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 significantly increased intracellular autophagic flux and the expression of key autophagy proteins such as LC3, Bclin1, Atg5, and the formation of autophagosomes can be observed. This has been reported in the literature.

However, after using the autophagy inhibitors chloroquine and wortmannin or knocking down Bclin1 and Atg5 by siRNA to inhibit autophagy, the anticancer activity of IVM significantly decreased. This proves that IVM mainly exerts an antitumor effect through the autophagy pathway. In addition, researchers also used the Akt activator CA-Akt to prove that IVM mainly induces autophagy by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Akt and mTOR. The phenomenon of IVM-induced autophagy has also been reported in glioma and melanoma as well. You need to know this information.

Where are we now on the use of Ivermectin as a prophyllatic for jab injury? We do not have anyone working on drugs to solve the collateral damage from jabs in reference to oncogenesis. The aftermarket data is showing a brisk pulse of cancers in people who are jabbed. This reminds me of the situation we were in with HIV in the late 1980s and Early 1990s. This was solved when protease inhibotors were found to be useful for this condition. Today, I think Ivermectin maybe the best choice decentralized clinicians have to help those who took the jab.

Ivermectin works in cancer because it somehow controls both apoptosis and autophagy in some way that still eludes us. I doubt BigHarma will study it because this creates a new pipeline of patients for them to sell new drugs to. This is why clinicians need to look to old drugs that can be repuropsed to help injured patients now. The relationship between apoptosis and autophagy is very complicated biophysically, and the cross talk between the two pathways clearly involeve light biophotons, water production, and magnetic flux and magnetochemical photoswitches. The control of both pathways clearly plays a vital role in the development of cancer.

Ivermectin in Oncology – The Science

In laboratory, Ivermectin has been shown to be able to kill cancer cells of many types, such as

• Breast Cancer: 

• 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26078298/ 

• 2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/ 

• 3.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29257278/

• Ovarian Cancer 

• 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/

• 2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33092251/

• Prostate Cancer 

• 1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505114/

• Colorectal Cancer 

• 1. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.717529/full

• Brain Cancer 

• 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755894/

• 2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30596403/

• 3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27771251/

• 4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4783079/

• Renal Cancer

• 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28847725/

• Leukemia 

• 1.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20644115/

• AML 

• 1. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559

• Hepatocellular carcinoma 

• 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35568994/

• Lung Cancer 

• 1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5156407/

• 2.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6982461/

• and many other cancer are helped based on work being published recently.

  SUMMARY

Mark Zuckerberg and the Biden Whitehouse participated in censorship and "Censorship activity killed people". THE FIRST AMMENDMENT WOULD HAVE SAVED LIVES if the government would have followed the constitution. This information on Ivermectin was buried by the NIH and by the Texas Medical Board. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden has been fighting them on this topic now for 3 years on your behalf. Please listen to the Danny Jones podcast we did together.

New NIH director for Donald J Trump, Dr Jay Bhattacharya: "The conclusion I draw from this is that this censorship activity klled people [and] the reality is that if the First Amendment had been truly upheld during the pandemic, it would have saved lives, led to less damage, less destruction, and fewer deaths."

I will remind of of this FACT again:

Read what District Court Judge Mark T. Pittman wrote in Decemeber of 2024 regarding the Pfizer vaccine! “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

Fauci and the CDC concealed their cover-up of American tax dollars being used for gain of function research. They should be held accountable by We The People and out elected representatives. If the government refuses to do it we have a duty to remove them from office by vote or revolution.

CITES

1. https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-kathleen-ruddy-2549748/

2. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep23138

3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166354213002945

4. https://portlandpress.com/biochemj/article/443/3/851/80615/Ivermectin-is-a-specific-inhibitor-of-importin

5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21321478/

6. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/press-release/