Nerding Day: Worth It or Woke
Added 2024-02-05 13:00:10 +0000 UTC
I'm going to pitch you a concept for a new website taking the internet by storm. You might have heard of it, but I want you to appreciate how a simple, brilliant premise is all you need for success. Ok, it's Rotten Tomatoes, only all of the reviews are written by one guy, and that guy super duper sucks.

Usually, I wouldn't be interested in covering a conservative movie review website, but this one is deeply weird. It feels like I'm watching someone learn how to grift in real time. The site isn't even a year old yet, and it seems like its creator, James Carrick, hasn't quite figured out how to do the conservative personality thing yet. For instance, one of the first things you see when you go to the website right now is a review of the movie Mean Girls. What does he think his audience will like about Mean Girls? The fact that the girl is mean? Certainly not the musical numbers and their distracting respit.

If you have to know if a movie is "woke" or not to enjoy it, the only way you're checking out Mean Girls is if you trip over the remote and accidentally switch off Reacher. Then you have to call your son to help you figure out how to use the remote, and he gets mad when you tell him they're turning the frogs gay, but you were just trying to make small talk about the new Frog And Toad series on AppleTV+. The frogs were always gay, dad!

Worth It Or Woke doesn't review things if they think they can mark them as "#woke sight unseen," but it thought their primary audience might be interested in Mean Girls, The Barbie Movie, and 80 For Brady? I get that It's a good idea for the Worth It Or Woke brand to tear apart movies that are already pissing off the Twitter conservatives, but I don't think anyone was particularly mad about Mean Girls? Also, James Carrick kind of likes it! He called it "A love letter to fans of the original" while also rating it Woke. I'm told Woke is bad and Based is good, but the rating system is so nuts I have no idea what the final verdict on the movie was.

Worth It Or Woke rated Mean Girls 60% Woke and 35% Based on their Woke-O-Meter, leaving 5% of the movie free to roam as it pleases in the lands between Woke and Based. They also rated several elements of the film individually, finding the visuals/cinematography to be 75% (or Wokeish), while the direction was 60% (also Wokeish). To be considered at all Based, a film must score between 90-100% on The Woke-O-Meter, our about double baseline competency. Here's how the site breaks it down:

How do you decide if cinematography is Woke or not? Are they putting too many women in the frame? Does Regina George have a poster on her bedroom wall that says "Ruth Badger Ginsburg Fucks?" Are a couple of the students at the Mean Girl school open-carrying some AR-15s? That would be Based, I guess? Luckily, the site has provided their definition of Woke; a page-long rant that includes right-wing greatest hits such as "Disney's Not So Secret Gay Agenda," but the meat of it is this paragraph:

There's a reason we, the ultra/radical-progressives, settled on a simple five-star rating system for movies. They're not Sega Genesis games. No one is looking for a reviewer's thoughts on every individual aspect of them distilled down to six different numbers. Especially not when those thoughts are how Aquaman is 80% Based, but its direction is 40% Woke?

Whenever I'm researching a project undertaken by a new right-wing firebrand, I find it's always helpful to ask what this man has failed at in his life to make him this way. Ben Shapiro is a failed screenwriter, Steven Crowder a failed comedian, and Glenn Beck a failed morning drivetime shock-jock. The site's one reviewer, James Carrick, describes himself as a "film enthusiast with a degree in theater and philosophy." There is an actor named James Carrick on IMDB who once portrayed the role of Chubb Anderson on Behind Mansion Walls. Is that the James Carrick we're looking for? God, I wish.

One thing I can say for sure about James is that the picture he uses on the website is either very old or something he created by putting "Ponzi scheme Topher Grace" through an AI image generator. Here's a side-by-side comparison of Website James Vs. Actual James appearing on Fox News to discuss "Biden's plot to make AI woke."

Fox News got James off the air almost immediately after not Yes-Anding their prompt to bash Disney's Little Mermaid reboot hard enough. When asked what he rated Little Mermaid, he didn't know, said it was "in the 30s," then went into trying to explain the rating system before Fox News pulled out a comically oversized cane and yanked him off stage. James doesn't have the right-wing improv skills for this job. When someone says black Little Mermaid, you're supposed to scream like it's the secret word, my guy.
Even Worth It Or Woke's merch store seems like nonsense liberals think conservatives would want to buy. They've got $12 "Come And Take It" shot glasses that contribute one dollar of each sale to Texas border wall defense in some unspecified way. They've got a First Amendment phone case. Their t-shirts are only available in manly colors. Worth It Or Woke respects that you can both enjoy the distracting respit of the songs of Mean Girls and also need to be able to fade into the woods when the revolution comes.

The reviews themselves read like any poorly written film review. The About Us section of Worth It Or Woke says that the site has a "religious conservative voice" (James and one other guy who writes entertainment news are the referenced us). I don't know what Jesus would have to say about Transformers Rise Of The Beasts, but I think if you're going to call yourself a religious conservative movie review site, you should at least speculate a little bit on His views. Instead, James mostly peppers broad complaints with lame car jokes.

James's bio on Worth It Or Woke says he "approaches dramatic criticism from a philosophical foundation." In the original version of his Transformers review, he called Pete Davidson "Pete Townsend" and then had to correct it after a commenter, Zippy Fister, pointed it out. That's the kind of high-brow philosophical debate you can find about Transformers Rise Of The Beasts you won't get anywhere else.

The site doesn't cover most movies with a strong message because the message is never "capitalism rules, high five." There's no room for a philosophical foundation in their highest-rated movies, stuff like Kid Explorer, released by The Daily Wire (95% Woke, brought down a bit by mere Wokeish Visuals/Cinematography), and Back To The Future, which they gave a perfect 100 out of 100!?


The….the movie where the guy has to run from his mom who's trying to fuck him like Pepé Le Pew? That's the most Based movie? A hundred percent Based? Not a Woke frame in that entire film? I still don't think I understand what based means. It sounds like basic, which is bad. It sounds like, "Yes, please, no seasoning on my tacos, but I'll take a nice cool bottle of ketchup, Mr. Serverino." Wait, I do think I understand what based means.

This article was brought to you by our fine sponsor and Hot Dog Supreme: Brandon Garlock, whose 23andMe results say he's 1/16th Wokeish on his mother's side.
You can read this article and every other one on the much better in every way 1900HOTDOG.COM.
Comments
It's kind of amazing that he went to the guy from The Who for his choice of "someone to confuse Pete Davidson with" instead of Peter Davison (Fifth Doctor and somehow also father-in-law of both Tenth and Fourteenth Doctor).
John Roche
2024-12-14 21:23:41 +0000 UTCFor people who insist facts don't care about your feelings, they sure get upset when the facts don't agree with their feelings. Those feelings largely being hating anyone who isn't a straight, white male who thinks you should be able to open carry a tactical nuke and use it on anyone eating something spicier than mayonnaise.
Matt Edwards
2024-02-07 21:16:49 +0000 UTCThat dude went from Topher Grace to Ted Cruz so fast I don't think there was even an intermediary Toph Grooz stage.
Brendan McGinley
2024-02-07 04:13:18 +0000 UTCI do not understand the right-wing mind, much less the right-wing mind's bizarre, inexplicable insistence on having a specifically right-wing version of everything from encyclopedias to dating sites to movie databases
Robert Kosarko
2024-02-06 17:38:32 +0000 UTCBecause sissyneck ain't woke, duh!
David Conner
2024-02-06 13:16:26 +0000 UTCIs that Gleep or Gloop? Gleep always struck me as woke.
Jeff Orasky
2024-02-05 23:32:14 +0000 UTCI know a few people where this is absolutely true.
Jeff Orasky
2024-02-05 23:31:13 +0000 UTCI can only assume he considers Birth of a Nation the greatest film ever.
Skink
2024-02-05 23:11:14 +0000 UTCWh…why do you know that an can quote a whole ass scene of this « movie » from the top of your head?!
Elgofo
2024-02-05 22:22:46 +0000 UTCI'm gonna cancel my membership if you do Woke Week. I won't support Cancel Culture because it sounds like Oingo Boingo, Babe.
Pee-Wee's Uncle
2024-02-05 20:23:42 +0000 UTCThe exception would be if an actual Black person said it (increasingly unlikely as the right has mostly ruined it), and that's where the Confederate parallel breaks down.
Bonnybedlam
2024-02-05 18:42:43 +0000 UTCIt strikes me that anti-woke is the new Christian media model (ie you get an automatic, loyal audience) with the added benefit of not having any pre-established values like charity and forgiveness to get in your way.
SudsiestPanda
2024-02-05 18:22:59 +0000 UTCFor too long, we've only known who the Best Boy was in movies, when we needed to know who the Based Boy was.
Matthew Harris
2024-02-05 17:51:56 +0000 UTCWell, nothing to say that won't result in thrown punches, anyway.
Skebotron
2024-02-05 17:49:15 +0000 UTCOr maybe he took Goldie's rise to power as irrefutable proof that we have solved racism (let's assume he wants racism solved, why not)
Herbzz
2024-02-05 17:44:13 +0000 UTCThis sounds like something my son would say so I ignored most of it. Calling something bad to mean it's good still makes the thing seem better than based. Based just sounds negative. There's probably some interesting confluence of events that have led people to understand it as having a positive meaning, but I guess we'll never know.
Herbzz
2024-02-05 17:31:39 +0000 UTCA parody site which rates the wokeness of gay porn would be very entertaining.
g.sys
2024-02-05 17:20:05 +0000 UTCThis is not the worst thing about this site, but I think I know how his rating system works, and it sucks. The final score on the Woke-O-Meter is the flat average of all the ratings like Direction etc, which is basically baby's first score aggregation, except for the Based score which doesn't have anything to do with anything. And the Woke-O-Meter is reversed: a high score should indicate something is more woke, not less. My rating for the rating system is 0% Based, which means 0% on the Woke-O-Meter, that doesn't mean it's based though guys how many times do I have to explain it, great musical numbers though.
g.sys
2024-02-05 17:08:15 +0000 UTCyes i agree kid explorer is lackin in based theres a part where a wife tells her husband his fly is down and he is embarassed and zips it up insted of saying yeah it is and I already knew that and I want it to be
sissyneck
2024-02-05 16:38:53 +0000 UTCIt's like a Confederate Flag patch on someone's shirt or jacket. I know immediately I have nothing to say to them.
Bill Culbertson
2024-02-05 16:27:48 +0000 UTCAnd the implied reference to "If it ain't broke, don't fix it?" Trick question, or no? Or a double-trick question?
David Conner
2024-02-05 16:11:20 +0000 UTCI love the word 'Woke'. The moment someone uses it, you know it's a good time to end your interaction with them.
The Parallel Viewmaster
2024-02-05 15:40:03 +0000 UTCIt seems like an exam question on double negatives. "If your uncle is wearing a T-shirt with 'If it ain't woke don't miss it' at Thanksgiving dinner, should you avoid mentioning your transgender roommate from college?"
Matt Edwards
2024-02-05 15:10:09 +0000 UTCThat's a fair assessment.
Scribbler Johnny
2024-02-05 14:47:11 +0000 UTCTo be fair, Goldie Wilson also fits an old-fashioned traditional conservative narrative as (from what little we know of him given all of 30 seconds in the movie) he seems to be a hard-working "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps" sort of guy. As someone who's definitely not a progressive, but also definitely not the sort of conservative this guy is, I think there's room for intelligent mockery of "woke" as well as "based" excesses, but we seldom get that.
David Conner
2024-02-05 14:45:08 +0000 UTCBased comes from the slang basehead, a term from the 1980s to describe people addicted to freebasing cocaine, a method which makes the drug smokable. The term basehead became synonymous with the crack epidemic that swept the United States at the time. Over time, calling someone based was a way of saying that they were a crack addict, or acting like one, especially in West Coast street slang. In the way slang things go, people acting eccentric or abnormal were labelled based. At least that’s what seems to have happened with quirky West Coast rapper Brandon “Lil B” McCartney. In reaction to people calling him based, Lil B decided to redefine the term. In 2007, his group, The Pack, released their debut album, Based Boys. In a 2010 interview in Complex magazine, Lil B described his new definition of based: “Based means being yourself. Not being scared of what people think about you. Not being afraid to do what you wanna do.” It’s not clear when Lil B started calling himself Based God, but by 2011 that nickname was firmly associated with him. Eventually, a cosmology of Based God (or BasedGod) emerged, referring to becoming a sort of higher power that Lil B could access, allowing him special abilities, such as the power to curse basketball player Kevin Durant. The re-invented based, as a signal of power and swagger, was picked up by the alt-right/white nationalist community online in the 2010s. In 2014, during a controversy over female video-game reviewers known as Gamergate, conservative commentator Christina Hoff Sommers was referred to as Based Mom for pushing back against criticisms that video games and their culture are sexist. Since then, referring to alt-right or right-wing conservative figures as based has become a sign of approval in online social-media forums like the pro-Trump subreddit, r/The_Donald. The more you know.
Jasper Phua
2024-02-05 14:43:27 +0000 UTCUpon reading "If it ain't woke, don't miss it," I concluded this must be an article making fun of "anti-woke" people in general by creating an obviously fake web site that embodies their quirks and features. Then I looked it up, and Poe's Law wins again.
David Conner
2024-02-05 14:39:02 +0000 UTCI would almost (but really not) want to see him explain how cinematography can be woke. My only guess is any shot that contains less guns than the Expendables poster and/or less T&A than a Mystikal video.
Skebotron
2024-02-05 14:37:56 +0000 UTCWhat's his stance on gay porn? Does he think Disney is responsible for it?
FancyShark
2024-02-05 14:30:57 +0000 UTC“ Whenever I'm researching a project undertaken by a new right-wing firebrand, I find it's always helpful to ask what this man has failed at in his life to make him this way. ” The revelation of this sentence is still bouncing around my skull. How incredibly correct.
Darth itHead
2024-02-05 14:02:38 +0000 UTCFor the life of me, I have no idea what "based" means, but it's usually followed or precessed by something awful, usually sexual.
Talking Alpaca
2024-02-05 14:02:02 +0000 UTCI'm going to spend the rest of my day trying to parse the tag line for this site
Vooster
2024-02-05 13:36:18 +0000 UTCMayor Goldie Wilson: Apparently Not Woke
Scribbler Johnny
2024-02-05 13:14:32 +0000 UTC