Nerding Day: The Dilbert Future
Added 2022-04-26 12:01:01 +0000 UTCThe Dilbert Future is a book about the future, written in 1997, by Scott Adams.
I’ve chosen to re-read The Dilbert Future. That’s right: “re-read.” In the late 90s, I was a tiny precocious ‘Dilbert’ fan. I read The Dilbert Future cover to cover, because I wanted every idea and joke I could get from my favorite cartoonist (Scott Adams). I also lacked money or agency (small child). So I acquired TDF by requesting it as a Christmas present. And I received it, which proves dyslexia was right: Santa is in league with Satan.
I revisited this spooky crypt of a book. And I was confident it would go fine. I’m now girded with the wisdom of adulthood. The perspective of actual hellish work experiences. The unfair advantage of pooping on guesses about the 21st century from that century. Still, Adams’s text contained a few shattering surprises. Maybe most shocking: mid-1990s ‘Dilbert’ comic strips hold up as pieces of comedy writing. You’d enjoy them! Some have a vile premise (e.g. “it would take a magic raygun to make male employees respect female employees, and that’s not the male employees’ fault”). Some have lousy art (e.g. every strip). But even those cartoons have a fully functional setup-punchline-tag. And I learned this about Scott Adams’s strips, because an astonishing percentage of his “new book” is reprinted ‘Dilbert’ comics. The Dilbert Future is more padded than a refurbished body pillow.
It advertises itself as a book featuring new material, future material even, and yet a huge amount of it looks like this:
Scott's rare thoughts on the future are surrounded by endless artifacts from the past. At one point he lines up five straight pages of raw regurgitated Strip-Dilb. And when you do hit solid blocks of the written word, you’re playing “did Scott already get paid for these words” Roulette.
Between my childhood and now, I forgot about this scamming. And I think that makes me special! I might be the only person who’s ever let The Dilbert Future mind-burgle them twice. I even bought it twice. The Brooklyn Public Library doesn’t have one, which I assume is thanks to an in-house exorcist. And I no longer own my childhood copy. That’s probably because I gave it away in an apartment move. But I can’t rule out the possibility that my Dilbert Future packed itself up, carny-style, to swindle the next town.
There’s much more to say about this book beyond “it’s a cash-in.” That describes many branded products. But the cash-in nature of this book points to a larger Trumpism. The second tremendous surprise of The Dilbert Future is that it’s written by Modern MAGA Scott Adams. He told us exactly who he is, in 1997, and it took until 2016 for us to catch on.
Are you aware of the Scott Adams timeline? The photo above is Adams’s 1997 author headshot. I like that guy. He looks like the sweet, whimsical cubicle-expat he sold himself as. I’m even jealous of his Dogbert denim, and would pay all the riches in Brooklyn for a Snoopy-sax version. However, here is Scott Adams now:
I’d also love to point you to a great book, containing words. Joel Stein’s wonderful 2019 book In Defense Of Elitism (tongue-in-cheek title! Joel is good!) tells the story of Joel schlepping to Scott Adams’s home to interview him (Joel is also a try-hard!). Joel learns Scott Adams lives in a 8,372 square foot East Bay mansion. Here is a tiny sampling of its carnival of strange features:
- Scott Adams’s house has a bathroom just for cats.
- Scott Adams’s house had an entire room for wrapping gifts. It’s now a room for his drums. That’s because Adams wrecked most of his personal relationships, with his own Trump nut stuff. So he no longer has a large enough friend group to need a gift-wrapping room.
- Scott Adams’s house has a tower overlooking its swimming pool. The tower is shaped like Dilbert’s head. On purpose. Right down to its two round windows mimicking Dilbert’s yawning-void eyes.
Adams’s transmogrification once shocked me. Because I remembered the Scott Adams of gentle cube-farm resistance-gags. But Adams also wrote “books” like TDF. They’re part of the revenue that built Mar-a-Lagbert. And when you read The Dilbert Future’s (occasional) text, you discover 1997 Scott Adams was a harrowing blaze of Sturm und Yuks.
Yeah! The first ~100 words of this book advocate a global eugenics program. In a ha-ha way. In the same way Idiocracy advocated it. But I’d like to think most turn-of-the-millennium jokesters outgrew that. Scott Adams chose to grow [Joker voice] stranger. He didn’t even outgrow his mid-2020 prediction that a Joe Biden Administration would kill most Americans by mid-2021. Scott Adams thinks the bad guy, in the situation of him broadcasting a mass-death threat, is anybody but Scott Adams. His wisdom “grows” about as fast as a Pet Rock.
Anyway, The Dilbert Future harps on Adams’s prediction that genetic “Induhviduals” will Great Replacement Theory the rest of us. He also recycles a comic strip where he already wrote this idea.
You discover this phenomenon throughout The Dilbert Future’s strip-to-text laziness. Whenever Scott Adams has a vile belief in his heart, and needs a comic strip that can run tomorrow, he places that vile belief in a Dogbert speech bubble. Scott Adams’s actual beliefs match that character. A character described as “a sadistic megalomaniac” on the Dilbert fan Wiki. And the readers of two thousand newspapers in sixty-five countries consumed those supervillain beliefs, while interpreting them as “humor.” Because dog!
In this context, The Dilbert Future’s author photo is a grim warning. Adams crams two cartoon characters into the frame. The characters? Two Dogberts. The rest of the back of the book? A third Dogbert.
That makes this book magic! It de-Dogberts Scott Adams, making his personal cruelty as plain as Times New Roman. For instance, he can’t get past page 4 without sharing the mindset guiding his futurism:
Scott Adams knows how to write and construct a joke. This list is not jokes. This list is megalomania, with a couple grandiose adjectives tacked on, decorating it like those old suction-cup Car Garfields. From there he shares what I can only describe as threats:
I am not exaggerating! This book is Scott Adams jumping up and down, waving his villain-arms, begging us to notice that he wants mass brainwashing to prevent kids from becoming Greta Thunberg. He only fails to predict the specific system that will do this brainwashing (2010s YouTube). Because he’s bad at futurism. But he’s crystal-clear on being an awful human being.
He also seems to know he’s bad at futurism. Because there’s not much futurism in Scott Adams’s futurism book. Scott Adams’s few actual future predictions are tedious guesses about how much more dial-uppy dial-up can become:
The rest of the time, he takes a confident stance, and makes it “humor” by making it both evil (so edgy!) and underbaked (too cool for school!). For example, he achieves a chirpy Jay Leno “have you seen this” tone on this page, about this topic:
Immediately after “solving” poverty with a heartfelt “if math was magic you’d have food”, Adams pivots, putting much greater energy into this crisis:
By the way, early in the book, he jokes about your total lack of consent for receiving this concept:
Scott feels flashing is funny if you’re also lazy about it, and appropriating Japan. That’s bad. He’s bad! And I’ve saved Adams’s grimmest chapter for last. It’s the last chapter of the book. And it begins the scariest way a “comedic” text can:
The final chapter of The Dilbert Future is pure uncut thinksperiments. It is Scott Adams repressing his Very Good Actual Jokes, so he can show us truths he attained by rejecting Very Confirmed Actual Science. It’s a cult leader’s manifesto, written by a guy whose #1 formative experience in the entertainment world was a cameo in the orbit of Joe Rogan. You deserve safety from this chapter. To keep your mind unharmed, I will only expose you to its table of contents summary:
To give you a taste of the incredible sourcing for its scientific trailblazing, one of his theories came to him in a Newsweek article he tripped over:
And another came to him in a dream, which he thought might be too embarrassing for a human, so he blamed it on his cat:
And some come from real science, maybe, but not fully remembered, though he thinks you'll sort of get the general idea. His words, not mine:
And finally, one of his theories comes from a friend who wrote a book about wishing, but he doesn't remember what it was called or who wrote it. Scott proceeded to transcribe that guy/girl/cat’s premise into Scott’s own book.
Wow: Scott is a great friend! You can see why he needed a gift-wrapping room just for gift-wrapping!
Anyway the chapter concludes with a section claiming magic affirmations have the power to bend reality. Not make you more confident, more driven, or other basic behavior adjustments. Scott Adams writes an entire additional appendix about how to do magic affirmations. Adamsffirmations, which he believes have a supernatural impact on events around you. Why does he bother to do that actual writing so late in the game? This reason:
That’s this book’s final, worst surprise. The titular Dilbert Future is a world where millions worship at the altar of DIY sorta-prayers. And as I finish thinking about this book, forever, I am so grateful it didn’t brainwash Child Me into becoming a Scott Adamstafarian.
...
Alex Schmidt makes Secretly Incredibly Fascinating, a fun podcast based on facts he read in better books.
If these images are borked, you can read this article and every other one on the much better in every way 1900HOTDOG.COM.
Comments
I am always baffled by the sort of mind that earnestly believes most people don't do crime because they just haven't thought of it yet, and they're in fact the kind genius for having thought of crime AND not doing it. They truly believe society exists on their sufferance but hey asshole: crowbars, super glue dildo.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-29 10:48:44 +0000 UTCAlways a + 1 for carny joke
Warwick Clark
2022-04-28 07:37:37 +0000 UTCIs this the book where he explains that the future won't be like Star Trek because: a) teleportation would just mean you could steal everything from your neighbor's house; b) medical tricorders would mean you could sneak up behind someone and seal their asshole shut?
Daphne Lawless
2022-04-27 22:29:56 +0000 UTCI would subscribe to Secretly Incredibly Fascist. I would throw that a buck on Patreon.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-27 20:54:58 +0000 UTC"God's Debris" is a much better title if you imagine it being about the character Debris Bardeaux from the 4th and 5th seasons of Arrested Development.
Matt Pedone
2022-04-27 13:39:50 +0000 UTCI think it's the "I'm thinking outside the box, therefore I CANNOT BE WRONG" attitude. Sometimes, the box is correct, or, at least, more correct. There's also the aspect that some of this "anti-paradigm" is simply disguised self-interest. Adams is okay with the dominant paradigm, he just wants to be at the top of it, rather than the bottom.
Matt Pedone
2022-04-27 13:37:25 +0000 UTCI was never really a fan of Dilbert but I had a similar experience with the works of Robert A. Heinlien. I loved reading them as a kid and now looking back as an adult I wonder how I did not become a fascist.
Eric Rose
2022-04-27 12:58:00 +0000 UTCAs someone who was home-schooled: That's entirely fair.
Clifford Tunnell
2022-04-27 07:56:41 +0000 UTCScott Adams: Secretly Incredibly Fascist. Although it’s one of those “worst kept secret”s. Having said that, hailing from the land of sarcasm and satire, it took me even longer to realise this wasn’t a bit, and that he really is a piece of shite… Great article, as always!
Christopher Horne
2022-04-27 05:56:00 +0000 UTCoops
AU
2022-04-27 05:10:59 +0000 UTCI read this book at the time (as an adult, even). I remembered thinking, “Dilbert guy is kind of going off the rails, isn’t he?”
Marc
2022-04-27 04:38:39 +0000 UTC@Matthew Harris, so what you’re saying is that Scott Adams has all the symptoms of being home-schooled? Cuz that tracks. He could be the Surgeon General’s warning on home-schooling curricula.
toasty god
2022-04-27 03:23:15 +0000 UTCholy fuck how did we all have this book
Lord Mo
2022-04-26 22:39:40 +0000 UTCThis Nerding Day has rapidly turned into Reflecting Day
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 21:13:29 +0000 UTCMine is Pete Gallagher but for VERY different reasons.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 21:10:48 +0000 UTCScience is 5000+ years old which I *think* is legal in this part of the cosmos. Check with philosophy first just to make sure.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 21:09:52 +0000 UTCTo be clear, it's not the worst thing I know about him. It isn't anywhere near the worst , and a lot of his other opinions are much more awful, and with real-world consequences. But they don't bug me more. Probably a part of it is that this was in the pre-social media, pre-'fake news' days, where it was harder to realize that famous people weren't just idiots, but awful idiots. As science-lover(not in a sexual way. Unless science is over the age of consent, then yes in a sexual way), it was a combination of: - a creator that I had kind of respected falling in love with a theory that a teenage boy could debunk in less than a minute - the same creator claiming that no-one could offer any rational disagreement with the theory(thereby inadvertently insulting me specifically) - lying about an anonymous science-man who is secretly working on the same theory that Adams dreamt up - lying BADLY about it.
The Parallel Viewmaster
2022-04-26 19:49:07 +0000 UTCSo a question I have for myself: when did I decide that "thinking different" was not an adequate way to be a different person. I was born in 1979, so in my childhood, we only had 5 television stations. We had the newspaper and a few national magazines. And by the time I got to be a teenager in the 1990s, I realized this was inadequate, and came up with the brilliant idea that everyone just had to "think different". Any type of media that was critical of the "dominant paradigm", no matter how half-assed or sketchy, was basically on "my side" because it wasn't mainstream. And even into the early 2000s, that was how I viewed the world. So I would have still, into the middle of that decade, read this and thought "Adams doesn't believe in the dominant paradigm, he is questioning the validity of 'science' and 'corporate structures', so he must be worthwhile". And it was only slowly that I started realizing that just "thinking outside the box" was not enough to make someone good or worthwhile. I mean, on paper, I could have admitted it, but that was still my main way of approaching media. It wasn't really until the last decade where I had to reevaluate that.
Matthew Harris
2022-04-26 19:33:58 +0000 UTCSo there must have been like ten years where Adams was writing these strips, where the audience was rooting for poor, sweet everyman Dilbert, but Adams thought that we were are all rooting for cynical, cruel Dogbert? Was he accidentally making good jokes that he didn't understand?
Matthew Harris
2022-04-26 19:11:08 +0000 UTCI have a serious answer to the question of bullying, given as someone with an M. Ed: bullying in kids is often a side-effect of kids learning how to communicate and enforce social norms. Which is why (in the US at least), the worst times for bullying are about 10-14, when kids are creating their own social structures. Before that, kids are usually supervised by the teacher, who dispenses "the rules". After that, in high school, kids have internalized their codes and norms. My belief is that a lot of bullying is a byproduct of kids learning to communicate social expectations, for the first time. Which is a clumsy process--- things that adults communicate with an eyeroll or a snort, middle school students communicate through a week of name calling and sometimes physical violence, So in terms of this--- I don't think Scott Adams needed more bullying, but he seems to have missed a period of socialization.
Matthew Harris
2022-04-26 18:51:30 +0000 UTCChives are good but you probably want to do a butter sauce instead of Worchestershire.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 18:50:46 +0000 UTCThe other day I mentioned on the discord that I didn’t understand why people cared about Adams being a douche - after all Dilbert wasn’t ever beloved like Calvin & Hobbes or the Far Side. I guess in young Alex’s case I was wrong. Some people loved it.
James Boyd
2022-04-26 18:44:15 +0000 UTCI don't have any onions, can I use chives? Because I bought 30 dollars worth of chives on Amazon to save on shipping costs and now I have all these chives.
Matthew Harris
2022-04-26 18:38:05 +0000 UTCScott Adams still rates as my #1 Cartoonist whom I’d like to hunt for sport and eat.
Chris “Ace” Hendrix
2022-04-26 18:31:14 +0000 UTCYet.
Chris “Ace” Hendrix
2022-04-26 18:26:33 +0000 UTCWhat Friday article?
Matthew Harris
2022-04-26 18:15:41 +0000 UTCI can't believe you're seriously advocating bullying baby chimps. Wow.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 18:11:34 +0000 UTCIn my defence as a cool child who had real friends I read a lot of Gerald Durrell and Thurber and that kind of thing as a kid, so I had read a lot of 'author just sort of bats around the English language in a way that's funny but doesn't exactly qualify as jokes' books, but those weren't actually dry runs for genuine political beliefs. I assume. One minute I'm just going to google 'James Thurber'+problematic right quick
Horse Macho
2022-04-26 17:30:44 +0000 UTCYeah but I like chimps better than children, so their anarchic violence is acceptable and funny.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 17:07:20 +0000 UTCI do feel that if the worst thing you can think of Scott Adams doing is being wrong about the concept of gravity you haven't looked close enough at his twitter feed. Nor should you.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 17:02:21 +0000 UTCThat gravity section is exactly where I started drifting away from Adams too! Going by the comments here, that chapter was like a demarcation point for our entire generation.
Robert Lee
2022-04-26 16:48:10 +0000 UTCSomehow "God's Debris" is the most chilling thing he could title that
Alex Schmidt
2022-04-26 16:45:16 +0000 UTCI also think it's part of how his strips fooled us. He's skilled enough at comedy writing principles to know the lower-status character (Dilbert) should win at least some of the time. That's why he accidentally writes some humane strips!
Alex Schmidt
2022-04-26 16:43:54 +0000 UTCI feel much less alone learning the whole community also read this 😄
Alex Schmidt
2022-04-26 16:42:32 +0000 UTCAccording to the criteria offered by Alex in this article, your sister is almost certainly an agent of Satan. I take no pleasure in reporting this.
Skebotron
2022-04-26 16:35:59 +0000 UTCMeanwhile I'm kind of flattered someone implied I was a "working adult."
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 16:21:35 +0000 UTCHow can you equate bullying to giving a chimp a magnum? I'm pretty sure no one in our nice little community would condone bullying, but we would all crowdfund free handguns for chimps!
The Parallel Viewmaster
2022-04-26 16:20:30 +0000 UTCRanting time! I guess I'll join everyone else by confessing that I was a Dilbert fan and had this book as a dumb 15 year old. I thought I'd feel embarrassed to admit that, but it feels good to say it, like taking an especially stupid weight off my chest. Anyway, back whatever point I was making... I kind of still enjoyed Dilbert after reading this book for a while, but Dilbert Future is the exact moment where I started to see the flaws with Scott Adams. Not from the political subtext...I was a teenager and too dumb to subtext... but that fucking gravity section. Because the article rightly doesn't get into it, a summary: the section is devoted to the idea that gravity isn't real; it's just that all matter is expanding and 'gravity' is caused by it pushing against other matter as it expands. I might have been a dumb 15 year old who couldn't subtext, but I was also a dumb 15 year old who knew a bit of physics and astronomy, and I wasn't a dumb enough 15 year old to ignore the fact that the 'matter is all expanding' pretty much can be disproven by... well, pretty much anything about gravity discovered after the 17th century. Black holes, orbital rotation, density... stuff most dumb 15 year olds at least heard of in school by that time. People can be wrong. Even as a dumb 15 year old, I could forgive that. However, to not even mention some basic concepts of physics and how they work in his theory made my dumb 15 year old brain very suspicious. To also write that absolutely nobody offered reasonable criticisms, however, for a strip that at the time had a strong audience of nerds, made my dumb 15 year old suspicions a lot stronger. To the point that my dumb 15 year old brain came up with a new concept: 'asspull'. I still read Dilbert for a couple years after that, but after noticing the flaws in the book, was finding myself more and more critical of Adams' other work, and pretty much outgrew all of it by the time I was a dumb-but-not-as-dumb 17 year old. Still, even after all the other stuff that went on with him, the gravity thing bothers me the most. I was glad to forget all about that book. Now, I'm not going to blame Alex for bringing all that back. That blame goes to my sister, who gave me a very specific birthday present a couple years back: a non-humor philosophy book by Scott Adams, which exists for some reason(It's called 'God's Debris', in case you want to look it up, but don't look it up for your own sake). A book that, no joke, starts with God explaining the exact same 'gravity isn't real' theory to the protagonist, with the exact same flaws. In other words, this is something that Adams actually believes deeply, despite the fact that probably some smart people read his previous book and wrote back in great detail about exactly why he was wrong. TLDR: My sister knows me too well. GOD I hate her.
The Parallel Viewmaster
2022-04-26 16:13:56 +0000 UTCThank you for falling on this grenade for us, Alex. I still have some of the old Dilbert books, but I’ve avoided reading them again out of fear of what I’d find
FancyShark
2022-04-26 16:11:39 +0000 UTCIt worked too! Disconnected lunatics posting shirtless pictures of themselves on twitter to own the libs is *exactly* how I picture an alpha male
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 16:02:12 +0000 UTCat least hes done the main villain thing of making a big building out of a face. dont see bezos or musk with a big dumb house with a face on it
SoylentRobot
2022-04-26 16:01:01 +0000 UTCOkay, I do now feel the need to be absolutely clear and point out, that part is a joke, like when Johnathan Swift suggested eating Irish babies. Even if Irish babies are delicious with Worchestershire sauce and onions.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 15:50:27 +0000 UTCI'm just sad that the collapse of print media can't bring him down anymore. Like if he'd only started Dilbert in 2010 he could be a twice divorced bank teller in Cincinnatti instead of a weird fascist in a Dilbert mansion.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 15:17:44 +0000 UTCAdams' expanding matter theory sounds a lot like comic book great Neal Adams' "expanding earth" theories, which started as a refutation of plate tectonics and quickly grew into "all of physics is wrong and I'm correcting Einstein's errors."
Scott David Hamilton
2022-04-26 15:16:13 +0000 UTCBullying isn't and never was about correcting behaviour or attitudes, it is and only ever was simply inflicting pain on the vulnerable for kicks.
Swift Justice
2022-04-26 15:10:52 +0000 UTCI have a lot more thoughts on this, but in the interest of not depressing myself and possibly others all day I'll just think about how at least we have a nice little community here, and thank you for being generally rad and cool to trade comments with. I'd like to finish with a joke to lighten the atmo but all I can think of is a half remembered dick joke involving snapping turtles and it just doesn't work in comment form.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 14:59:38 +0000 UTCThis is the meanest thing anyone has ever said about me.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 14:58:27 +0000 UTCThe 1900HotDog audience is 100% comprised of people who were obsessed with adult workplace comedy as children. Now we are working adults obsessed with children's media.
Vooster
2022-04-26 14:36:33 +0000 UTCYes. Lil' teen edgelord Vooster thought all the mean, nasty things in the book were just jokes! He was pretending to despise humanity because hyperbole is one of the pillars of comedy. Oof, no, he meant it.
Vooster
2022-04-26 14:28:49 +0000 UTCYeah he's just farther along the "Crazy" axis than Rowling, give it a few years as she burns thru the Fantastic Beasts cash and she'll be out there claiming trans youths are poisoning her teeth and people should buy her Harry Potter branded pussy candles, because that's how you ward off The Gay.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 14:22:19 +0000 UTCAlex is so right: the Dilbert strips DO exhibit competent joke structures and are (sometimes) actually funny. Which makes them better than at least half of the shit in the Sunday paper. Which fucking sucks. Fuck you, Scott Adams for being semi competent.
Jeff Orasky
2022-04-26 14:21:19 +0000 UTCOMG! Alex! I was also a weird tweenager that read all the published Scott Adams Dilbert books, including this one. I don't know why I was so obsessed with the drudgery of working in an office while I was still in middle/high school. It's a shame Scott Adams ended up being such a dick. 12 year old me didn't pick up on the obvious warning signs. This must be how Harry Potter fans feel.
Vooster
2022-04-26 14:10:22 +0000 UTCI needed this addressed. Thank you.
Fatamatician
2022-04-26 14:04:42 +0000 UTCI read this book as a kid too. Apparently we all did, going by the comments here? The only two parts I remembered up until I read this article was him proposing his own theory of gravity, which he illustrated with Dilbert jumping up and down on an expanding ball, and him saying the Dilburrito, available in stores now, was the food of the future.
Robert Lee
2022-04-26 13:51:35 +0000 UTCThis is a fair comparison! I'm not kidding!!!
Alex Schmidt
2022-04-26 13:43:20 +0000 UTCI hear you. One of the toughest lessons I've had to learn in life is that some of the oppressed, when given half a chance, will be twice as cruel as their oppressors. Some people just treat life like a live service video game. You start out getting kicked around by the overpowered Korean power players and racist tweens with their own credit cards, and by the time you're max level it's time for revenge! Not on those OP Korean players and the Playskool racists. They've moved on, so you take it out on the new crop of level one dorks, ensuring the hideous cycle continues forever. I think the internet showed us they don't even have to be rich and important to get to that place. Half of Reddit is dedicated to fomenting the evil in a bullied dork's heart. If the only way you can parse human interactions is through hierarchies, the only way to be happy or at least left alone is to be the biggest bully of them all. And why wouldn't a bullied kid adopt that worldview? It's being demonstrated as objective reality every day. It just that the rich ones get to be louder about it. The rest of them just hurt vulnerable people in smaller, more proletarian ways. And so it goes.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 13:43:07 +0000 UTCBoomer business guys worshipped Dilbert comic strips. It was inescapable in our household. Still have the books - still have THIS book - at my folks' house. And I'm certain there's a stuffed Dogbert there, too. Sigh.
CHAUGGLE
2022-04-26 13:38:09 +0000 UTCOh yeah absolutely, giving children access to racism and homophobia is creating the social equivalent of a chimp with a magnum. Fortunately I still haven't had my empathy burn out completely so it's still entirely a joke. Dudes like Scott Adams are types I just have zero patience or any of that empathy for. Probably because I recognize those tendencies in myself. I have no doubt The Dilbert Guy was enough of a dork to get bullied in school, he has big "briefcase boy" energy and there was a period of about three years after some testing got done where I consoled myself with the fact that I was bullied because I was smart and I was a similar kind of kid. Personal story time: About the time I was 12 or 13 I saw a kid about my age on TV who was one of those kids who got told they were a genius, you know the ones? In the 90's it was usually a smarmy looking white kid with a bowl cut who's parents could afford to teach them the violin. Always the violin with kids like that for some reason. This particular kid came across to Young Sausage as just so fucking smug and irritating it gave me this flash of self insight, "This is what you seem like to other people, probably. Maybe you aren't all that smart, because this kid seems like he's maybe just been told he was? He's saying some shit and it seems dumb, like your dad says shit like that and he sure as hell isn't a genius.", and between that and the bullying giving me a permanent fear of public toilets, I like to think I learned a degree of empathy from the experience but I have plenty of anger to direct at people like Scott Adams, who turn it into permission to become a bully themselves.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 13:17:57 +0000 UTCBut the same is true of Pete Gallagher and all he brings me is frothing joy like a Dadaist cocaine Santa.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 13:09:14 +0000 UTCAll I'm going to say is, it's a good thing Friday's article on memory tips reminded me that every day is Upsetting Day.
Skebotron
2022-04-26 13:01:22 +0000 UTC"Scott's rare thoughts on the future are surrounded by endless artifacts from the past" describes his twitter timeline pretty perfectly.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 12:50:57 +0000 UTCI kind of thought it wouldn't given his trajectory from "Harmless dipshit newspaper comic for unfunny old office workers" to "fascist blogging lunatic".
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 12:48:04 +0000 UTCWe're going to have to establish gentlemanly rules of bullying then, a sort of playground Geneva convention, because I was a smart rich kid (+2 bullying) but also queer and autistic so you'd think that would be a -2 bullying and it evens out to just being ignored (solid 0) but actually it added up to all of it? Like 100% bullying + several felonies? You can't trust shitty kids with identity-based cruelty math is what I'm saying. I suppose I just don't agree that giving kids lifelong suicidal depression because of their parents bank statement is good policy in the long run. If anything it made the gay scene around here a lot less fun.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 12:47:41 +0000 UTCWe all just sat there and let Scott Adams pretend he actually draws Dilbert by hand instead of dragging Illustrator vectors into frame -- No wonder he thought he could get away with lying to our faces even as he opened his kimono.
Brendan McGinley
2022-04-26 12:40:48 +0000 UTCAmazing. I read this as a kid too. I don’t think it ever occurred to me that Scott Adams might not be joking, even in the places he said that explicitly.
Darth itHead
2022-04-26 12:39:13 +0000 UTCI try not to be the kind of person who lets a joke belief become a real belief, but Scott Adams is one of those people who makes me think maybe certain people should be bullied MORE as children. Not everyone, just the bright kids and rich kids, because when a smart or rich kid starts believing in themselves, you get a Scott Adams spending all his time writing in his blog about how you can hypnotize yourself into cumming good.
Flippant Sausage
2022-04-26 12:36:21 +0000 UTCI, sissyneck, will assend to the stage at the church variety show tonight and play the saxophone part from Baker's Treat as good as any snoopy dog
sissyneck
2022-04-26 12:36:09 +0000 UTCWell it didn't get better at all but at least Sturm und Yuks is an invaluable contribution to the language. Any language.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 12:32:39 +0000 UTCBurn it all down.
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 12:24:02 +0000 UTCGod I read this book as a child. I must have been... ten? I distinctly remember thinking it was hilarious, because clearly no human could really think all those things. The only other thing I remember was skipping the chapters at the end, because he said there wouldn't be any jokes in them and so I lost interest. What an absolutely haunting memory to dredge up! Thanks, Mr. Schmidt!
Horse Macho
2022-04-26 12:18:05 +0000 UTCThis is like Mein Kampf, where Hitler literally spelled out everything he planned to do if he came to power, except here it's some dork who thinks if he spouts some ultra right wing bullshit it will make him look like an alpha male.
Max Rockatansky
2022-04-26 12:17:37 +0000 UTCI've read only the first sentence of this article and it's the most dark and ominous shit I've ever seen on this website. Let's see if it gets better!
Clementine Danger
2022-04-26 12:12:00 +0000 UTC