XaiJu
galaxypink
galaxypink

patreon


The Only Home We've Ever Known

(the Ultra HD 3840x2160 version is attached)


"That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives."

In trying to keep things in perspective lately, I can't help but think about Carl Sagan's speech about the "Pale Blue Dot" - the image Voyager I took of the Earth from about 6 billion km away, where it appeared smaller than a single pixel.

This high resolution 3D model might be a little more gaudy than a single pixel (especially with the Ultra HD resolution containing 7.5 million pixels), and my favorite picture of Earth is not the Voyager one but "The Day The Earth Smiled" from the Cassini probe we sent to Saturn. But in any case I think it's fair to say the Earth is a beautiful place when you're too far away to see the daily struggle.

Or as Joseph Campbell said, the suffering is "foreground to a WONDER."

(This image, by the way, is the background to another wallpaper I'm working on for this month that I hope will be pretty wonderful - it's got naked girls in space)


If you don't want to hear a poorly structured rant about politics, that was the end of this post.

For anyone who hasn't been paying attention, I live in the United States (for now), and the United States just "elected" a pretty transparently troubling presidential and vice-presidential candidate, and they have gone on with making plans and floating possible appointees for positions in their new administration. I've honestly been trying to avoid the news for a while, but my wife is out in the city and at her college campus protesting multiple days of the week.

Here are some of the troubling things we're looking forward to currently:

-The new administration has promised important roles to various cronies, flunkies, and toadies, not surprisingly, a few of whom are pretty bad. Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions failed to qualify for a federal judgeship during the Reagan administration because of his history of racial bias (which includes calling white defense attorneys of black defendents "race traitors") but the new administration thinks he'll be a good Attorney General of the United States, in a justice department that only in the past few years finally admitted what statistics and a lot of people's personal experiences have told us for years - that there is already a problem with racial bias in the justice department.

Ex-general Mike Flynn believes ALL Muslims are dangerous terrorists and that Islam is a "cancer", and that prejudice carries over to Muslim-Americans. Since this administration has discussed monitoring Muslim neighborhoods and houses of worship (forgetting all about our Constitutional freedom of religion in this country) putting all Muslim-Americans on a "registry", and said they wouldn't rule out "interrment camps" using our interrment of the Japanese during WWII as a model (something I THOUGHT most Americans agreed was not only stupid, and useless, but a stain on our history), it makes sense that they want this idealogical fanatic and conspiracy theory believer to be our new National Security Advisor.

Newt Gingrich has left the short-list of cabinet nominees to focus on the Republican party, who he has suggested should bring back the House Un-American Activities Committee famous for the Communism "witch hunt" that got a lot of American intellectuals, philosophers, artists, entertainers, writers, and gay folks, arrested as "suspected communists" in the mid-20th century - because they were "Un-American". That's another thing I thought most Americans agreed was an ugly stain on our history. He also agrees with the new president-elect that the United States should abandon our treaties to defend our allies in eastern Europe if Russia wants to take them over (it does - it's part of their "Eurasian Union" plan).

The administration really seems to be going for a "basket of deplorables" sort of arrangement. They've been having meetings with prominent white supremacists and alt-right neo-Nazi supporters... out neo-Nazis in the U.S. have been CHEERING this whole time, because they believe it's Springtime for Hitler these days. About the election they've said that they've gotten "more than they ever could have hoped for". Everyone else is so sick of hearing about the election that they're pretending this is all fine.

-For anyone who hasn't been paying attention, I'm gay. LGBT folks have enjoyed some progress in the last few years. The incoming administration, in particular Vice President-Elect and fundamentalist religious fanatical fuckhead Mike Pence, wants to undo all of that. They've already said they would eliminate all LGBT civil rights protections passed by President Obama. Since, instead of any notion of fair play, congressional Republicans swore to stonewall and oppose President Obama on everything no matter what it was for his entire presidency, some of what happened was based on executive orders he issued personally. Remember that his opponents are conspiracy theorists who believe (completely falsely) that he over-utilized executive orders or abused his power - or is a secret Muslim who wasn't born in this country. They've already talked about rescinding all of his executive orders.

They've also already drafted a bill... not to abolish gay marriage per se (since that would involve the courts), but to allow individuals and organizations the "religious freedom" to ignore the marriage status of gay people whenever they fucking feel like it. Basically, anyone who feels like discriminating against gay people will have free rein to do so - it's Pence's Indiana anti-gay pro-discrimination law that made his state a fucking disgrace, only it's at the federal level, and it's been amped up a bit.

This affects me because I am married, and for example I'm on my wife's health insurance. If that bill passes (through a House and Senate both of which are controlled by the new administration's party, so... of course it will), my wife's insurance company could decide that it's cheaper for them to have "religious beliefs" that do not include accepting gay people as being married, and drop me from coverage - with no legal repercussions. I mean, this affects not just spousal benefits, it also affects next-of-kin and visitation rights (which have often been denied to gay couples before that became illegal in some places) if anything should happen to either of us...

Basically, our marriage, a hard-fought legal right, would be up to other people to decide on a case-by-case basis whether it is valid, for any value other than the paper it's printed on, based on their own phony interpretation of their religion (which as written is not nearly as discriminatory as they make it out to be... but does have a lot more slavery).

-Another frightening piece of legislation coming up - we should HOPE it doesn't get through anywhere, ever - is not from the administration but from some fascist GOP rando' out west. The new proposed law (a Pandora's Box of stealing away people's Constitutional rights) suggests that if a protest - a legal act protected by the First Amendment - is associated with any damage or disruption of business, ALL protestors and protest organizers can then be arrested.

I've known protestors for years, and I've heard plenty of stories of how the FBI sends in plants (also revealed as a tactic in now-declassified FBI documents from the 1960s), black block anarchists send in troublemakers, and idealogical opponents send in spoilers to mess things up for peaceful, legal protestors. It happens all the time. My wife has met phony protestors, and FBI plants in her time, since going to the Occupy protests a few years ago (all kinds of shit has been happening downtown lately). If there was a law saying that if ANYTHING bad happened ALL protestors could be arrested, every protest from then on would be seeded with troublemakers specifically there to just shut down every protest and get everyone arrested. That kind of thing already happens, to make peaceful protestors look like dangerous rioters whose greivances therefore don't need to be listened to or taken seriously.

That is an end-run around the Constitution, as bad as the PATRIOT Act, and would take away one of the most fundamental rights that separates us from autocratic regimes - the right to protest, the right to "assemble and petition the government for a redress of greivances".

For now, it's one bill in one state. Let's hope it never gets farther than that.

-Oh, the biggest point I could make about DISASTER FOR YOU (yes you, if you're in the U.S.) is that the new administration has said they want to model the economy on the state of Kansas. KANSAS. Kansas, the state that was run by a 100% Republican administration who claimed they were going to create unprecedented surpluses but since Republican economic policy literally always fails, BANKRUPTED THE STATE. Kansas is bankrupt. It had no Democrats, the Republicans there said "We can run this state as an experimental proving ground for Republican economic policy" - and that's what they did. They projected hundreds of billions of dollars in surpluses, they got hundreds of billions in deficits, year after year, excuse after excuse, re-election after re-election, and the state went BANKRUPT. Because of course it fucking did. "Trickle down economics" the derogatory term for the Republican economic policy that hands money to the rich and saddles the poor with the tax burden where they wait for the gains to "trickle down" - HAS NEVER WORKED.

Also, their new tax plan actually increases the tax burden on the poorest Americans.

-I'm not that worried about my safety since I don't actually go out as much as I used to. But I worry about my wife. There have already been hate crimes locally, including on her college campus - she's already had to deal with men in red hats following women around harassing them (but that is mostly happening to visibly Latina or Arab women), and there has already been violence against peaceful protestors. Locally, but also nationally. Of course, the apologists for the new administration claim every single one of those incidents is fake, orchestrated by some conspiracy-running billionaire. What a load of horse shit.

Some of those same people say that we should "get over it", and claim they didn't protest when President Obama was elected. Horse shit, again. If the election went the other way, they wouldn't "get over it", we'd have another Civil War (the one good thing I can say about the results of the election). AND, when President Obama was elected half the country lost their god damned minds. It has been basically a continuous protest since he was elected, and a lot of them have never recognized his legitimacy (despite winning both the popular and electoral vote, something their party's last two winning candidates have failed to do), or even paid him the basic respect of referring to him as "President Obama". The congressional Republicans and everyone in the right-wing propaganda echo-chamber of "news" has always called him "Mister Obama". Fuck those assholes.

They don't get to say, "Hey, you have to respect our candidate" now. Well, they get to say it, because for now we still have Constitutional rights. But I still get to say it's a load of horse shit.


I respect people who want to stay and fight for this country, to not let it the Bible Belt tighten around us any further, to try and preserve SOME of the civil rights gains of the last few decades that are going to be seriously challenged in the coming months and years. I feel for people who have to stay because they won't have the means to leave, and I wish them peace and safety.

As for me, I'm getting the fuck out of here. I love my wife, I'm pretty fond of being married to her, so we're keen to go live in a country that will let us stay married. Basically, it'll depend where she's able to get a job as a scientist - at least my work travels with me pretty easily.

My only other prerequisite is that my work has to be legal. Porn producers are on shaky ground in the U.K. and I think Australia, porn is outright illegal in some countries or heavily restricted in others, but other than the United States, Canada is probably fine, New Zealand, Ireland, maybe Scotland if they decide to stay with the E.U. and separate from the U.K. (when they voted for independence, I know the U.K.'s EU membership was a big part of why they stayed - they also voted almost unanimously against the Brexit)... I think that's about it for English-speaking countries.

We could go to a non-English-speaking country, since so many people around the world speak English now... but that would be a harder decision. The people might be fine (MIGHT - there's a lot of hatred for immigrants going around right now), but the government might not be so welcoming, at least until we learn the local language.

I don't know exactly what's going to happen, or where we'll end up. I'm just trying to get my papers together. I haven't had a passport since I was 17, so I need to get that... I haven't even been to another country since... um... since a friend and I went up to Montreal for a concert, maybe in 2005-ish.


I'm pretty pro-New Zealand. They seem nice. And they seem far away from the northern hemisphere and its nuclear weapons the incoming president DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE DON'T USE. I don't want to sound paranoid, but there is a pretty bad "worst case scenario" that we'd love to avoid.

Anyway, I THINK this is it for the "political" themed posts. I don't feel like talking about all this horse shit anymore. I want to get back to just posting art. Next post will be art. <3

The Only Home We've Ever Known

Comments

I also agree this is probably the wrong place to discuss such things, so I will simply say thank you for such extensive answers. You have provided me with a view I have not heard before, and I feel more informed.

sblgpfan

sblgpfan, it's rather complicated question, and difficult one. I can't recall Afghanistan events well - never paid much attention to it back then, and there wasn't much in media too. Can't say for all the people, too - they're lot of different opinions... Of the latest conflicts, namely, Syria, Crimea and Ukraine, I can speak with much more confidence. From our point of view the whole story of Crimea is "righting the long-time wrong": it was given to Ukraine, and now Crimea's people decided to get back to Russia. Definitely good. Period. With Syria - many people are wondering what the hell Russia forgot in the region, but most agree that since we have alliance with Syria and their government asked us to help against terrorism - that's a good thing to do... Some people, who understand a little more, also explain that this is a good opportunity to send a signal to all the world that Russia is no more weak, as everyone got used to since 1990-xx. With Ukraine there is quite different and very painful story. The people of Lugansk and Donbass didn't told aloud that they want to go to Russia, so we have no reason to help them in their struggle against Ukrainian putchists... So, we really do want to kick some Poroshenko's ass all the way to wherever he lands in very small pain-crying pieces, but we simply can't. All we can do is to provide some basic help like medicine and food. We can close eyes when some volunteers decide to help with something more military-oriented - like uniforms, spare parts or experience... All the while new Ukrainian "government" is deliberately tearing all the economic ties with Russia with nothing to provide instead, closing the facilities and firing lots of people... and winter is coming (oops). I heard from some analyses, that Obama's government did helped Ukrainian government with a little money, but also I heard that Trump's government will not. Well... It's real ugly, but without some help Ukraine is going down very fast. Well, there's lots of things I'd like to say, but... First, I still think it's not the right place. Second, those last two day were extremely tedious and I simply don't have the brain-power to explain everything I want to tell. :-(

It's Mr., do no worry about it. :) What I meant by enter conflict was any time Russia has ever used force for any reason. I am not trying to accuse Russia of anything, just understand a different view. Here in America you will find that Russia is often dipicted as the bad guy, both in media and in the news. Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan, you name it. Russia is shown as the one getting involved for their own power-hungry ends. What I was wondering is how does the average Russian view conflicts they find themselves in, regardless of reason. How Russia was depicted in Rambo III is pretty much how they are actually viewed, at least that is what I feel like. (If you have not seen Rambo III, basically Russia is depicted as trying to take over Afghanistan through mericless slaughter of civilians and torture of captives.) Note that I do not think Russians are anything like they get depictd in media. I figure their depiction is due to prejudice from the cold war. Also, do Americans get shown the same way in Russia, as 'the bad guys'? PS: My apologies to Galaxy as well if you would rather we not discuss such topics here. It is just you have such an interesting and diverse fan base.

sblgpfan

I think it's a bit late, still... Mr (mrs? ms? sorry, if wrong) sblgpfan, can you please tell me when the Russia did entered the confilicts in last quarter a century? The only one I can remember (I'm a bad with history, I'll admit it) - the Syria, and there was a direct request from current government (you can say that this government is "bad", but the fact stays: it's current and by all the laws is legitimate). The point is: not the "enters in conflict", but "nobody asked it to enter the conflict". And, given the opportunity, I'll mention another topic, of Stalin being a butcher. Galaxy, if You think it's not appropriate here - please remove it. We're supposed to discuss your great art here, not some very arguable and shadowy history. ;-) I did some history-digging. There's a "citing" that "Stalin got Russia with wooden plow and left with nuclear weapon". It's assigned to Churchill, but he never said that (officially). However, the idea is quite like that. I'm far from idolizing him (my own granddad was repressed), but he really did a lot - a lot of good too, beside a lot of bad. I think any really big historic figure is like that - a lot of everything, good and bad alike. After WW1 the Russia was quite weak, and after revolution it didn't get much better. During the Stalin's reign we got strong enough to win the WW2(*), to get nuclear weapon in time to not be attacked by USA and were first to go in the space. On the other hand, the price was high... but I still think that cost of Stalin's failure will be much, much higher. So in my opinion as bad as he was, he did just enough of good to rest in peace. * - Yes, the World War II was won by Russia. If you don't think so - look at the losses. I mean Germany losses. Even the official ones (4m died on eastern front vs 1.4m died on western front) are quite telling. And some people quite persuasively point out the German losses on eastern front to be more like 7 or 8 millions dead. And, of course, there were injured and captured on top of that.

That's hard! There's only one thing I like to be hard... and it'll be featured in my next art post. &gt;_

Yes, I think we can both agree that criminals should be forced into prison. ^_^ A lot of Americans are a lot less interested now, in interfering in other countries (and are very ready to admit we did too much already), and it sounds like a lot of Russians feel the same way now, compared to how things were in the past. Trying to get control or territory all over the world probably cost the USSR way too much money - being a world superpower in an "arms race" with the United States when we were at our wealthiest was probably a bad idea, economically (not that it was a good idea for us to do it either, even though we had the money in the 1950s-70s). There's potential good to come out of the US and Russia "normalizing relations", if it ends up with nobody really being the bully of the rest of the world... that's kind of a necessary comeuppance for the United States, for sure.

There's no way to reply on reply, so new comment. And it continues to post it when I just want to add new line... ;-) I completely agree with your point. Like you said - nobody should be FORCED into anything (well, except criminals into prison, but that's different story altogether). The reason of my original comment is about "countries being forced by Russia". Believe me, we don't want to force any country. We had full lot of it back in USSR times, like half of Africa and other so called "third-world countries". Back then we "bought" other countries (with money or weapon or whatever, for no other reason than to count them on our side) and this was quite a load on the russian people. Now we more like "hire" them, offering something mutually beneficial. And if they don't want to - nobody sane will force them, as there's too much ways nowadays to make anything "forced" to be simply not worth the efforts... World's changing - not only cannons matters now but many, many other things... Quite funny to see it all myself - when I was a kid there even were no personal computers at all, and now I'm a programmer with quarter a century worth of experience and people around me simply don't know how it was back then without PCs... ;-) And such abrupt changes, too, are not good, be it law or politics. On the other hand, as I understand, the economic crisis still growing worse and something MUST be done...

I think the most basic viewpoint on the new administration is that it's all Right-wing, the legislative branch, the executive administration, and the judicial branch - and the last time we had that, we got Bush 2 - the guy who lied his way into endless wars that bankrupted the country and instituted economic policies that collapsed the global economy... and he ran as a "moderate" conservative. Now we have an administration with support from literal American neo-Nazis (there's a news video going around now of a conference they held in Washington D.C. where they said "hail Trump" and gave Nazi salutes)... some of whom are joining the administration as advisors and staff. The best-case-scenario will be if it's a bunch of hot air. Let's all hope for that! &gt;_

Sorry, don't see the way to reply-on-reply. You said about USSR times, and what did US back then? Sat still? Not exactly: Vietnam, Koreas, Afghanistan... Al-Cayede at the very least... It was a big war (thanks God - a COLD one), and two blocks clashed on every opportunity and possibility. There was quite a lot of bad things on both sides... I'm ready to admit that on my side, what about you and YOURs? ;-) BTW, about Crimea... I heard not so long ago that some americans (and I mean real native americans, not afro-americans or euro-americans, but indians) wanted to leave the US and live in their own independent country... So much for freedom, right?

*cough* Crimea *cough* They haven't done much bombing to convert for a few years, but they were defiantly into bombing people to convert them to communism before the fall of the USSR.

Ben

&gt;the United States should abandon our treaties to defend our allies in eastern Europe if Russia wants to take them over (it does - it's part of their "Eurasian Union" plan). You sound as if there's something bad in Russia trying to make alliance of it own, like US and western European countries did about half a century ago... Isn't it a little bit same racism you're complaining about? How many countries did Russia bombed into "democracy" in last, say, quarter a century? What Russia wants the most - is equality among other countries. But politicians are telling incredulous lies and people prefer to believe them because it far simpler to be afraid of and accuse something you don't understand, than to try to understand. Doesn't it sound familiar to you? I must admit: I'm not LGBT-friendly, I simply don't care. As long as people abide by the law and don't mess with other people - I don't care what else they do, because it's THEIR personal life. I can like it, dislike it or go to hell with it - anyway, it's THEIR personal life and my opinion has zero value here. Why does US think something is different on the international politics scale? Each country has the right to decide for itself, nobody wants Big Brother to decide what's better for them.

I hear NZ is nice, and that they properly recognize marriage there.

Ben

Don't leave! Stay and fight!

rtpoe

Kudos for speaking out for the majority (of the popular vote), and for a neat rant that made for grim (but informative) reading. From a distance its hard to get all the telling little details of the incoming new admin, so again: much appreciated. Wishing both of you all the best, and for all of us that part of those plans will turn out to be hot air vented by empty heads never intending to actually implement them, at least as far as they would be bad for their own business (if for no other, more decent reason).

Tondor


More Creators