In case of interruption...
Added 2024-03-16 04:17:18 +0000 UTCKeep tabs on my twitter for updates
Things have been topsy turvy this week with policy updates on multiple platforms and I'm so, so tired with all the changes in social media etc. I'm hoping things will be able to continue as normal but I'll be making some back ups and ideally my own web page so I can have some form of consistency.
At least this will get me off my arse to update my branding given that Panspermia ended over a year ago oops.
Comments
Well it just dosent make sense cause you have creators like opik, softcore, sweetnessadmirer etc who make fiction fantasy soft core nsfw content/art barely even classified as porn. Then you have OF accounts of actual people doing very graphic things irl and selling questionable items to their fan bases. And people are saying the artists are the bad ones. 🤔
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-18 05:03:45 +0000 UTCAs well as challenge the rights of creators to make and distribute porn (ranging from softcore sexy outfit/scenario art to explicit hardcore stuff).
hypershock18
2024-03-18 01:00:18 +0000 UTCFor taking action, I don't ask that we win, at least bring attention to the issue and perceptions revolving around feederism. That we challenge why art of it is bad and how the perceptions can be challenged
hypershock18
2024-03-18 00:58:06 +0000 UTCI did hear some artists thinking of using subscribestar
hypershock18
2024-03-18 00:51:58 +0000 UTCI did wonder about taking collective legal action, if a bunch of us can get a bunch of lawyers and work together, we can challenge this new rule as a free speech violation
hypershock18
2024-03-18 00:51:12 +0000 UTCWhat if we started a petition?
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-17 10:13:54 +0000 UTCAnd the storyline it's very gripping
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-17 08:26:59 +0000 UTCWhile, as we have seen time and time again, giving a pass to far worse things cause reasons but we who just want to enjoy the female figure on a much fatter scale, we’re the real bad guys 😒
Chumlee99
2024-03-17 02:13:44 +0000 UTCWhen I use the term porn, it's not just, stuff with explicit scenes but stuff that is mainly made to titillate. It can range from sexy posing and outfits to nudity. Yeah, these puritan types think they're doing a good job banning porn, but all they're doing is making it hard for creators and audience and end up ruining the site by causing less creators submit work to them
hypershock18
2024-03-17 02:10:51 +0000 UTCSeriously. If DeviantArt came out and said we're banning nudity, kinks, fan-fiction, ships, kissing, or anything suggesting bodily contact. they'd implode within 20 minutes as everyone abandons them.
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 23:49:23 +0000 UTCLike if DeviantArt said, "We don't want any porn including nudes or sexy pin-ups?" They will lose a lot of creators in the process. We may joke about the internet being 90% porn but that is important for a lot of sites and without that porn, they'll probably see a lot less traffic and people using said sites.
hypershock18
2024-03-16 23:33:14 +0000 UTCThanks for the heads up on this - it affects my site too and I never even heard it was happening. I think we're all just going to have to go back to using web sites again.
Supercake Studio
2024-03-16 23:16:56 +0000 UTCI remember that and it was like, do you people not understand your own company and why it’s profitable?
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 23:15:05 +0000 UTCRemember a year ago OF was gonna do the same thing and they had so much back lash from that they'd backed out of it
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 23:06:22 +0000 UTCLove to see that too
hypershock18
2024-03-16 21:42:05 +0000 UTCSide note: now all I can see in the Wacky Candy verse is a bunch of ads with models but they’re all enormously fat, fatter than fat, like in the next arc Katie is waddling by a billboard and we see three gargantuan ladies all saying “Wacky Candy, makes taste paradise”
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 20:36:15 +0000 UTCThis is a paradox, on one hand, we are sold unhealthy junk food and then told we have to be thin and eat healthy and when we are fat, it's bad, how dare we be gluttonous piggies stuffing our faces? How dare we buy the things companies want us to buy and suffer effects from it? Do they want us to meet their ideal standard of beauty or buy the food they sell?
hypershock18
2024-03-16 19:59:04 +0000 UTCI hear subscribestar is better and dosent take a massive cut from creators unlike patreon
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 19:56:09 +0000 UTCI know softcore went through same thing last year on Twitter
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 19:22:43 +0000 UTCWhich is semi ironic considering how many billions a year are spent on advertising telling us to eat and drink.
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 18:39:58 +0000 UTCI feel like the last remaining strong hold against these burgess is discord
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 18:26:27 +0000 UTCI thought our views about bodies and food would be major factors towards their dislike to feederism.
hypershock18
2024-03-16 18:24:54 +0000 UTCWhat I said?
hypershock18
2024-03-16 18:24:23 +0000 UTCVery creepy graphic
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 18:13:14 +0000 UTCI also figured this is a dislike towards feederism. That Bpdy Positivity is okay because it's women embracing what they already have. Feederism is bad because someone is deliberately gaining weight and willingly eating unhealthy amounts of food to get fatter. In our diet obssessed culture wanting to become fat or embrace fatness is crazy. We're told that attractive bodies are thin, ripped and we must always be on a diet. Food is bad because it makes us fat and have diabetes and heart attacks. The image of feeders in mainstream media also isn't positive. We are seen as abusive boyfriends who manipulate our partners into adopting unhealthy behaviors so they can be worthy of our love. They are also likely are horrified when they read WG fiction where people embrace being bedbound and eating themselves to be that fat. A lot of obesity documentaries often focus on bedbound people. How it's horrifying that their fat has distorted them, how they're prisoners in their own homes. How they have a myriad of health problems. Our WG fiction where immobility is desirable is likely deplorable to these people. That we eroticize horrific scenarios like this and wish it on ourselves or our partners. Just the people of this site being horrified that people want to become fat and embrace immobility. That we find the scare stories in obesity documentaries to be sexy is disgusting to these people. They ignore that most of us wouldn't dare enact that in the real world. We may write and get off on bedbound partners and people getting fatter and fatter but I doubt most of us would take it to such extremes. There's loads of porn with messed up scenarios, but odds are most of the time, it's a fantasy. Like how BDSM people have stuff where people are tied up, kidnapped and abused but they wouldn't want any of that to happen to them in real life.
hypershock18
2024-03-16 18:12:43 +0000 UTCI think most of them are into much more graphic stuff
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 18:02:31 +0000 UTCPersonally if I could I would hire an army of hackers to go after the politicians and elites who are pushing all this stuff to expose what kinks and sex stuff they’re looking at online. We discover who likes fat and blueberry inflation
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 17:31:21 +0000 UTCIf you don't already know, back in December Patreon updated their content policy to specifically ban feederism and pro-ana content and they've started to enforce it.
Mabuse7
2024-03-16 04:26:26 +0000 UTCjust spit balling here, but is there another round of anti-kink crack downs going around?
Chumlee99
2024-03-16 04:24:10 +0000 UTCAll good take yr time
SarcasticObserver1
2024-03-16 04:19:27 +0000 UTC
