Early access mnemonic essay: "How the quantum search algorithm works"
Added 2019-04-01 16:18:09 +0000 UTCThis is a followup to "Quantum Computing for the Very Curious". Using just the ideas from that essay, we explain in detail how the quantum search algorithm works. This algorithm does something remarkable: it can search a search space of N items after examining the search space something like the square root of N times. The first time I heard this I was shocked, and convinced it must be a mistake. In fact, it works (albeit with a few caveats), and uses clever and beautiful ideas.
If you'd like to read the essay, please use the following link:
https://quantum.country/search?access=patreon
If you have any trouble, please let us know - it can be tricky getting access rights to work. Please don't share the URL, as we're still doing final testing - we expect to go public with it in a couple of weeks.
Thanks for your support!
Michael (for Andy and Michael)
Comments
Thanks Channagiri, much appreciated! (Michael)
Andy Matuschak
2019-04-27 01:25:44 +0000 UTCI think Andy and Michael should rewrite most textbooks or provide the tools to every textbook written where mnemonics and recall is part of the learning. I read a lot, but for the first time, I am hoping to recall the material read and apply it intelligible. Thanks - it is truly an outstanding contribution.
2019-04-27 00:35:19 +0000 UTCIt's a typo - the x2 should be x3. We'll fix it. Thanks!
Andy Matuschak
2019-04-16 14:04:42 +0000 UTCAlso since the aforementioned: s(x)=x1∧x2∧x3 and ∣x1,x2,x2⟩∣0⟩∣0⟩→∣x1,x2,x3⟩∣x1∧x2⟩∣x1∧x2∧x3⟩. I prefer ∣x⟩∣0⟩∣0⟩→∣x⟩∣w(x)⟩∣s(x)⟩, over ∣x⟩∣0⟩∣0⟩→∣x⟩∣s(x)⟩∣w(x)⟩, Even though they are commutative, the first one seems more straightforward.
2019-04-16 07:40:53 +0000 UTCHi, I wonder if this is a mistake or just misunderstanding from my own. Topic: Getting a clean black box In the article: ∣x1,x2,x2⟩∣0⟩→∣x1,x2,x3⟩∣x1∧x2∧x3⟩, In my mind: ∣x1,x2,x3⟩∣0⟩→∣x1,x2,x3⟩∣x1∧x2∧x3⟩, I think the latter one makes more common sense.
2019-04-16 07:36:02 +0000 UTCThank you!
Andy Matuschak
2019-04-09 14:07:40 +0000 UTCawesome content, awesome format/medium, congrats !..and thanks
2019-04-09 07:35:05 +0000 UTCAnd yes, I had not minimized it, was just a background window.
2019-04-05 23:14:47 +0000 UTCYes, I think I had loaded the tab but not started reading yet, so the header would have been displayed. Your theory sounds pretty plausible to me. I was using Chrome on MacOS.
2019-04-05 23:13:34 +0000 UTC(Andy here): Thanks, Daniel! One hypothesis: the essay's shiny header will consume lots of CPU, but it should suspend itself when the header is scrolled out of view, the browser is minimized or hidden at the system level, or the tab is not frontmost. Is it possible that you had the header in view, and the browser was in the background, but not minimized or hidden with Chrome > Hide Chrome? If so, we should probably just add an idle timeout on it.
Andy Matuschak
2019-04-05 20:44:03 +0000 UTCThanks Daniel, noted and we'll look into it. What OS was it on?
Andy Matuschak
2019-04-05 20:32:48 +0000 UTC