OA799: Trumpland: Come for the Federal Court Follies, Stay for the Glaring Ethical Conflicts
Added 2023-08-28 05:00:41 +0000 UTCToday, Liz and Andrew tell you everything you need to know about Mark Meadows's efforts to remove the Fulton County, GA RICO indictment to federal court; about Sidney Powell's efforts to demand a speedy trial; and about the rising tension between Donald Trump and the rest of his co-conspirators.
After that, the duo break down the impending ethics crisis in the Southern District of Florida documents retention case, and discuss how Judge Aileen Cannon, FSW, is on the verge of ignoring very real conflicts that could prevent Trump's two co-defendants from getting a fair trial.
This is an unpaid post on Patreon.
Notes
Fulton County GA docket
https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/Index/142
Georgia v. Meadows removal (federal) docket
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67694389/the-state-of-georgia-v-meadows/
State of Georgia v. Clark (federal removal docket)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67713789/the-state-of-georgia-v-clark/
GA v. Latham federal removal docket
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67730534/the-state-of-georgia-v-latham/
Latham removal
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.319599/gov.uscourts.gand.319599.1.0.pdf
Chesebro speedy trial motion
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23925099/23sc188947-demand-for-speedy-trial.pdf
Sidney Powell speedy trial motion
https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/2126/DEMAND-FOR-SPEEDY-TRIAL-SIDNEY-POWELL
Meadows reply sup removal
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.319225/gov.uscourts.gand.319225.45.0_1.pdf
Ulbrich v. State, 870 S.E.2d 859 (2022)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8364812589412216761
CNN on identity of 30 unindicted co-conspirators
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/17/politics/trump-georgia-30-unindicted-co-conspirators/index.html
Comments
You've mentioned a few times that a defendant can only invoke their right to a speedy trial if they have not done anything to waive it. Does this qualifier only apply up to the point where they ask for a speedy trial? If Willis proceeds to work towards a schedule to meet the speedy trial demand, is the defendant committed to it? Or can they back out at any point? I understand that moving the trial date out (after both parties agreed to it) would face push back from the judge... it would help if you could separate this from how the right to a speedy trial works.
Why do podcasters say moron that later
2023-08-30 01:10:26 +0000 UTCHeidi Cruz is a managing director at Goldman Sachs, I think Lyin Ted is the one riding the gravy train, not Heidi.
Steve S
2023-08-29 19:00:56 +0000 UTCIs number onanism mathturbation?
Murcury Vapor
2023-08-29 14:39:40 +0000 UTC
