#T3BE 165 - Full Question Text for Patrons
Added 2020-02-07 04:00:00 +0000 UTC
Comments
I am not a law dog... I think it's either B or D, but I'm leaning towards D. A seems like a bad practice. If I'm on the jury and I receive one instruction then be instructed to ignore that instruction but abide by another instruction with presumably very subtle differences, I would probably get confused. If that happened, would that not be grounds for the plaintiff to move for a mistrial? C sounds too general. Can you just submit any nonsense and appeal after the trial? B sounds like a good system to me and at least in my mind it comes down to whether the judge has the final say over this kind of thing. So it's either something that can be appealed or not. If it is appealable, then D seems right. The appellate court can then look at the case and decide on whether or not to take it up, right?
Kevin Weatherwalks
2020-02-07 14:47:12 +0000 UTC
