#T3BE 151 - Full Question Text for Patrons
Added 2019-11-01 03:00:01 +0000 UTC
Comments
The answer is B. It's not adverse possession, as others have pointed out, so D is out. It's not A: oral licenses are not necessarily invalid. It's not C, because there was no original easement the owner failed to mention. I think easements generally need to be in writing, and for something like promissory estoppel to apply the neighbor would need to have taken action based on that promise to their own detriment. More real property questions!
the character limit is too small for my international shoe joke
2019-11-03 16:47:39 +0000 UTC
