XaiJu
Casefile
Casefile

patreon


Behind the Files question time

Hello Patreon. It’s time to get your questions in for the next episode of Behind the Files. The upcoming episode will cover cases 167 Jai, Tyler and Bailey Farquharson, 168 Gudmundur and Geirfinnur Einarsson, 169 Corinna Mullen and 170 The Caffey Family. Send your questions in below.

Comments

Greetings from Texas, USA! I was glad to hear a case from our part of the country. Just wondering if you plan on sharing recordings of interrogations or other media in addition to the narration? I know that in older episodes this was the case and I think it would really help to better understand the individuals involved in cases, especially when hearing their tone of voice.

J. Chips

Just wondering if any of the research for these most recent cases involved speaking with the families or people involved with the crimes?

kayla noftall

Hello, just a general question for all “Behind the Files” broadcasts, could you give a quick recap of each case as you begin to discuss them? I’ve listened to so many and don’t always remember the exact premise apart from the names of the victims. Thank you!

Megan Karwan

I smell another rat here- sorry but it reminds me of the Jeffrey Macdonald case in the states just a little-

Pegi Miskey

Just listened to the Caffey family- the poor loyal dog was loved by one or all of the dead family members- definitely not the father since he gave the dog away and I can’t help thinking that the family dynamics might be even worse than he admitted to. Plus narcissistic children are usually created by narcissistic parents or at least one of the parents and one of them survived this so I’m sure he’s it Just my opinion and i know it will be offensive to some people but his continued support of her points in that direction

Pegi Miskey

Pertaining to the Farquharson boys, what do you consider to be some of the duties of true crime podcasts in discussing crimes of a horrific and also quite recent nature.

matthew oakley

In addition to this does the team have any thoughts on why the perpetrators would bring Sarah to the apartment and involve her in what happened there? Was it a complete spur of the moment attack, or did they bring Sarah knowing something might happen that night? It's so confusing why they would bring another witness in on it, and then make her a victim as well.

Amber

Regarding 168 (Icelandic one), was wondering if there was any investigation or accountability for what happened? Did no-one get charged for the way the accused were treated? Did they change the laws so you can’t be held without charge? And are there any current investigations into what really happened? That case in general is just stunning so would love to know what was left out of the episode.

Stefan Bradley

For Case 169, I was surprised that Angela was initially charged with complicity to murder, rape, and kidnapping, even though she seemed to be in the same situation as "Sarah". It was relieving to know those charges were dropped in the end, but was the only reason "Sarah" didn't receive the same charges because she came forward 20 years after the fact? If Angela came forward instead of "Sarah", would the charges have been put on "Sarah" instead?

Connor Z

Maybe a bit of a general question. Normally the schedule is „three weeks on, one week off“. This time you released four long episodes in a row. Is this the new norm? (Hope it is :))

David Rogosaroff


More Creators