More encounters, or varied levels? - Poll
Added 2021-05-11 20:39:25 +0000 UTCGreetings world builders!
Now, I know this is a new content line, but I wanted to see what you all value, and what you want for future content.
So.
What would you prefer -
- 1. More unique encounters - encounters for more of my maps released more quickly, but at fixed levels (lets say hypothetically 10 unique encounters per month). For example one encounter might be a level 3 encounter, another for level 5, another for level 10, etc.
- 2. Or encounters at varied levels - eg an encounter with the option to play at lvl3 or lvl10 (hypothetically 6 or 7 unique encounters a month playable at 2 different party levels)?
Let me know what you'd prefer with the answers below.
EDIT -
For those concerned about these encounters taking time away from my map making, fear not. These encounters are written by professional writers (who run everything by me) and don't require any time away from my map painting schedule. This is bonus content for you, AND me :)
Happy gaming!
Comments
Hi Niilo, thank you for sharing your views. As I said to Steve - these encounters don't take any time away from my map making, so no need to worry there :) The encounter is attached to the Encounter Archive as a PDF, however the encounters are only available as a Moonlight Archivist reward
Moonlight Maps
2021-05-12 05:58:53 +0000 UTCThat's good to know Jason, thanks for the feedback!
Moonlight Maps
2021-05-12 05:54:32 +0000 UTCHi Steve, I'm glad you're here for the maps and enjoy what I'm making. Perhaps I should have clarified - 'I' am not making these encounters, they are being written by professional writers who run everything by me. I am 100% in the map camp :) so don't worry about having any less of that, or missing out on potential content. This poll was just to see if you all had a feeling either way for bonus content :)
Moonlight Maps
2021-05-12 05:51:59 +0000 UTCI agree with Steve here: I signed up for the amazing maps, and do not even play D&D or Pathfinder or equivalent. Often I can't even use these encounters in my game system due to the striking difference in setting and tone, I'd much rather make my own. Am option to reflect that in the vote would have been appreciated. I would be willing to give the already posted Preemptive Strike a chance, to see if my assumptions above are correct. However, I cannot even access it. The Archive for encounters is a post with nothing but a header on it, and I cannot access the encounter through any of the links in the announcement post.
Niilo Franska
2021-05-12 04:29:03 +0000 UTCI'm here for the maps. I can use your maps and create my own encounters based upon the party level, what is going on in the campaign, and the storyline that makes the most sense. So, taking time away from making the maps to make encounters is taking away from what I came here for in the first place. Didn't see an option for "No/limited encounters", so I did not vote in this poll.
Steve Mulhern
2021-05-12 04:21:22 +0000 UTCI personally prefer more unique encounters -- I can do the work to shift the encounters up level myself if I need to.
Paugus
2021-05-12 00:15:22 +0000 UTC
