I just mean you said you don't believe anything unless you see it with your own eyes or it's 100% fact. But from my perception, we all put our trust in 'experts' without thinking about it constantly, or questioning it. From my experience with the environment and health you rarely get to work with absolute certainty, and our standards change continuously based on new science. So with the vaccine I totally understand scepticism, but I'll place my trust in the experts as the lesser of two risks.
Jake Walker
2021-06-30 13:06:11 +0000 UTC
meaning what tho?
YB
2021-06-30 11:45:17 +0000 UTC
The thing is you trust scientists and academics every day without questioning it. Just drinking water, eating food and breathing air is down to what scientists say they can put in your body. You're already deep in to a scientist based world without questioning it. Trust me as an excloosive source.
Jake Walker
2021-06-29 07:55:58 +0000 UTC
dont forget them SAME old white scientist dons told you there was WMD in iraq.. many of u science/ politician dons were the SAME ones saying 'but bro the UN scientists have seen them'..' now what? like is aid, i don tbeleive NOTHING unless i seen it with my own eyes. otherise its just hearsay. unless theres 100% scienficit consensus then its just opinion/shill/ paid for. for example, the sky is blue is scienfici fact
YB
2021-06-29 02:16:21 +0000 UTC
u cant talk about science.. unless youre actually a biologisy/ chemist AND was there to know whats even in it. science is jsut what some next old white don told u it is lol. he could tell 99.99\5 of the population its magic nut juice and u n me couldnt tell u wtf it is. Not to mention MANY actual qualified doctors have COME OUT and been SILENCED, what u think about this? why is govt/ media silencing PROVEN doctors?? they aint done that before for real genuine ish. seems sus to me. but each to their own. as long as its not imposed, yall can shoot ALLL the fruity cabal love juice ya want into ya arms haha
YB
2021-06-29 02:13:03 +0000 UTC
there are several reasons that make this current situation different:
1 - all covid jabs are experimental and not approved (normal development cycle is 7-10 years)
2 - risk of dying from covid if you're under 60 is less than the flu.
3 - Most populations have already reached herd immunity naturally so the jab isnt necc.
4 - Covid Jab isn't proven to stop transmission
Adam Mork
2021-06-28 22:55:34 +0000 UTC
‘Probably’? Take the risk then. You anti-vax for everything or just Covid?
Ex_Mosquito
2021-06-28 21:46:26 +0000 UTC
Lol how they want us to take a vaccine for something most of us have probably been exposed to and done just fine hahah
James
2021-06-28 21:08:40 +0000 UTC
Well I’ve had both shots and I didn’t have any symptoms at all.. you guys are crazy, science isn’t your to get you. You’re too suspicious.
Ex_Mosquito
2021-06-28 20:51:18 +0000 UTC
Mother of three report dead yesterday after blood clots after taking first vaccine... Beside my neighbours dad who died in the same week as having the vaccine from Ealing hospital, had organ failure and wasn't sick prior to the injection however his wife took it n she is fine... As we already know tests haven't been carried out long enough to show the side effects... My good friend Micheal had the vaccine last month to fly to Africa... He rang me last week Friday from hospital... Because he's started having seizures to which he has never had before.. Prior the vaccine... He could lose his lorry licence if this becomes reoccurring... Again related side effects haven't been followed up why because the request for the jab had been super fast tracked for some reason
Jonathan Lake
2021-06-28 18:30:01 +0000 UTC
Isnt the point of the vaccine you get a mild form of the flu, and then your body builds the appropriate antibodies? Seems standard for flu jabs no?