CTR 2.1 RC5 - RELEASE!
Added 2021-04-23 16:02:25 +0000 UTCCinebench R20 included. Before you use the new smart diagnostic, make sure you have curve disabled in the BIOS and DRAM OC must be stable.
_______
The program is in a 7-ZIP archive. Download the archiver
.NET Framework to 4.8. Download
_______
What's new?
- DYNAMIC PROFILES (Zen 3 and Renoir). Automatic creation during diagnostics.
- Improved performance for applications that do not use CPPC tags.
- CTR automatically adjusts "Holding time". No longer available to the user.
- Increased application launch speed (4x times).
- CTR has driver priority. Allows it to work more efficiently when the system is under maximum load.
- Improved accuracy for creating profiles during diagnostics.
- Reduced CPU usage for the CTR process.
- A simpler way to activate profiles (no saving required).
- Soft start for any profile (crash protection).
- Improved security for communicating with SMU.
- Numerous minor bug fixes.
_______
Special thanks to @Riwwelorsch, @Ann Martiné, @ACE, @arcanazen, @DayDreamer, @Gadfly, @rizlah , @&&Devin, @Bloax , @wanderinarcheologist and @Stattik for help with development and testing RC5.
Comments
This option only adjusts the rendering rate of the graphical interface. Sensors pooling rate - constant, 16ms.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-29 18:02:44 +0000 UTCIs there anyway to reduce to polling period below 500 to increase ability for CTR to catch OC instability before system crash.
Brant Parrish
2021-04-29 18:00:52 +0000 UTCSo CineBench is Intel supported, or not?
DeeJay
2021-04-28 11:04:16 +0000 UTCauto-starting improved ib ver17. but for CPPC error - one system reboot is enough
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-28 11:01:38 +0000 UTCThere are benchmarks that Intel helped create, they prohibit or limit the use of the best cores. AIDA, CPU-z and other benchmarks are non-optimized software. I guess Passmark is the same way.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-28 11:00:33 +0000 UTCIssues with it not auto-starting and I get an error saying unable to see CPPC core tags. All BIOS settings are as recommended.
Tanveer Jugpal
2021-04-26 23:18:45 +0000 UTCRC5 for me works well in general, I like especially the usability improvements that make it simpler to use. On the performance side, my 5950X runs cooler and pretty stable at just 1.05V SOC. However, the determined clocks are way lower than previous RCs and so it doesn't come close to performance of e.g. CTR 2.0 RC3. I've played a bit with the clocks, and I can easily set higher ones (like Diagnostic of previous CTRs would recommend), but then I see in-game crashes/reboots. Only mitigation was to lower the clocks but this then again affects scores in Cinebench. Interestingly, R20 scores still are high in comparison, however e.g. Passmark scores are pretty low compared to CTR 2.0 RC3 or say CTR 2.1 b2. Obviously the benchmark logic varies a lot.
DeeJay
2021-04-26 19:42:07 +0000 UTCThank you, so for all 3? I mean low, mid, high?
Balazs Mate
2021-04-26 16:54:51 +0000 UTCFor PX OB the same as for P1
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-26 16:49:22 +0000 UTCGreat work Yuri, my cpu temp drop down avarege 50 to 30 amazing! Now I have to find the correct ob (mv) value, because I have lots of restart, pc unstable :(
Balazs Mate
2021-04-26 10:46:53 +0000 UTCI'm on 1.2.0.2 on a B550 and it's working fine as well.
Ericsson Hwang
2021-04-26 07:49:43 +0000 UTCI actually wasn't able to pass it before turning on CTR. I know that is not recommended, but at this point I'm so desperate that I couldn't care less. On my 5800X and ROG Strix X570-e Gaming I was able to run the same sticks at 3800 MHz without any issues. I thought the upgrade of both CPU and board would let me go even higher to the mythic 4000/2000 MHz. Nope. I think there might be something wrong with the current ASUS BIOSes, because an earlier version (with AGESA 1.1.0.0) did go even a bit higher than 3800/1900 (Strix+5800X). BTW, LinX with CTR crashes after 6–7 minutes; it was 4–5 without it. I suspect the sticks might be overheating, but this is because I always had to push a bit more voltage to them than DRAM Calculator suggested (at safe settings). According to all reviews these RAM should rock, but ASUS just don't like 4 sticks and suck at RAM OC anyway. I wish I had bought a B550 MSI Tomahawk at the quarter of the price of my board and was done with it. That's what I recommended to my friends (and B450 MSI Tomahawk before B550 was out) and the DRAM OC capabilities were in another league compared to ASUS mid–high end boards.
Vecchio
2021-04-25 21:13:43 +0000 UTCWell I'm not sure about the 5800x but my 3800x had very little room for getting higher clock speeds, as it was pretty much maxed out at stock. I got my performance gains by reducing voltage/temps to maximize sustainable clocks. Have since upgraded to a 5950x
Krewd
2021-04-25 20:55:32 +0000 UTCHave you tried reducing the P1 profile clocks slightly? On RC4 I had to reduce it by 25MHz on CCX1 and 50 on CCX2 to pass LinX without errors. Or I could have rechecked my LLC earlier after a BIOS reset... :D
Shinigami_de
2021-04-25 20:27:46 +0000 UTCI've been playing with this version for a couple of days now, reading all that I can. I have not seen a huge performance increase, but my temps are way better. Running a 5800x, asus x570 tuf, 32gb of 3800mhz ram, 1200watt power supply and a arctic freezer ii 360mm, what should I try tweaking to gain a little more performance?
David Ibbotson
2021-04-25 16:55:01 +0000 UTCOr delete the profiles that are in the folder with the CTR.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 16:05:15 +0000 UTCIf you need to disable the autoloading - delete the task in “Task Scheduler”
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 15:59:54 +0000 UTCSeems like there's a system.applicationexception. unable to start service
Ywc
2021-04-25 15:27:31 +0000 UTCI might have messed up some settings. Keeps blue screening after I apply ctr at start up and restarted. Is there a way to disable it auto apply setting?
Ywc
2021-04-25 15:03:33 +0000 UTCNo advantage for my 3700x "silver" sample compared to some very good energy plan + PBO. System got unstable while gaming even with very safe settings of CTR and all stess tests done. But i`m happy for all users who get more out of it!
Sakaana303
2021-04-25 14:28:34 +0000 UTCThanks for update :)
Harry Fuller
2021-04-25 12:25:21 +0000 UTCUnfortunately after much trying and experimenting, I have gone back to PBO using board limits which give me 11300 in R20 with 5950X with no stability issues or WHEA errors after any benchmark/stress testing. I can not complete diagnostic no matter what I change. Yuri, if you want to (have the time) we could do a TeamViewer session as I believe this is an issue with the app - or a fault that only occurs with CTO..
Harry Fuller
2021-04-25 12:21:36 +0000 UTCThank you! I'm using it with a 5800x and a B550-E Strix but it's very unstable and it crashes as soon as I start Cinebench R23. To fix this, I followed the manual and used P1 OB value for PX ones. It worked pretty good for 4 hours then crashed once more. I mostly played games during this time (SoT, FFXIV). Here's a screen of my settings (I deactivated profiles to prevent crashing): https://imgur.com/a/nuGNI0a All BIOS settings are good, RAM is stable and I have a V-DROP of ~1.3%
Addict
2021-04-25 11:19:56 +0000 UTCThis is due to excessive PX boost .For PX OB set the same value as P1 CCX1 OB. If this does not help, lower the frequency for all PX sub-profiles (-25MHz). On Tuesday I will publish a special version of CTR for newbies. If you find it difficult - wait for her.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 10:11:26 +0000 UTCThank you very much, I used ctr 2.1 rc5 to clock my 5900x. But this makes AIDA64 cache and memory benchmark crash :( some1 has an idea where i should begin?
Gufur
2021-04-25 10:06:31 +0000 UTCOnly partially successful. Hope that the failed LinX won't bite me in the ass down the road.
Vecchio
2021-04-25 09:55:00 +0000 UTCThank you for your answer.In the end i dint get 5GHZ stable it crashes in R23 every time
Marko Todorovic
2021-04-25 06:26:59 +0000 UTCGlad your experiments are successful
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 06:08:31 +0000 UTCNice :)
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 06:07:27 +0000 UTCReboot system
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 06:06:25 +0000 UTCthis is just a standard blank template
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 06:05:44 +0000 UTCIt is safe, but it makes no sense, by raising the voltage you degrade performance. IDLE is 0.3 volts and 0 MHz (effective), which is the maximum it can be.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-25 06:04:18 +0000 UTCI tried the Diagnostic 3 times and I got the early reboot + Platinum Sample bug every time, it only went smoothly when I downgraded to 1.2.0.1 Patch A, after diagnostic I updated again to 1.2.0.2 and this is working good but also the "Autostart with OS" dont work, CTR dont start with windows when I restart and I enabled/saved in many ways and order. Im using a Rog STRIX x570-E
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-25 03:46:33 +0000 UTCThank you so much! Works like a charm for my 5900X. Temps max at 75 °C during Cinebench. I wish RAM overclocking was this easy. I'm using ASUS X570 Dark Hero (BIOS 3501) with 4×8 GB Patriot Viper Steel 4400 MHz. Couldn't get any higher (without errors) than 3733 MHz @ 16-16-16-32. And I still fail LinX after 4–7 minutes. No errors in TM5 after 30 minutes, no errors in DRAM Calculator Memtest after 3 successive runs at default settings. I've spent days and nights tuning the RAM without much success.
Vecchio
2021-04-25 02:27:48 +0000 UTCI have Agesa 1.2.0.2 on MSI X570 Tomahawk and RC5 version 15 is working fine. The PC also rebooted on the first diagnostics run and CTR reported that I have a Platinum sample. It went smoothly on the second run. I'm still trying to tame my PX settings. I think you need to NOT be afraid about lowering the values because the clocks would boost to >5 GHz when OB is enabled.
Norman P. Aquino
2021-04-25 02:13:58 +0000 UTCI downgraded to previous BIOS with Patch A AGESA 1.2.0.1 and diagnostic runs fine, no "PLATINUM SAMPLE" reboot bug. I only get the reboot AT THE END of the diagnostic and I get Silver sample category (gold at times), but this is a normal behaviour. Try downgrade your BIOS and run diagnostic again.
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-24 23:00:50 +0000 UTCI run on ASUS b550-f with Version 2201 Version bêta 2021/04/08 ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) BIOS 2201 "- Update AMD AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.2 - Fix USB connectivity issue and i've got NO problem.
Dominique Gregoire
2021-04-24 22:48:03 +0000 UTCAlso the reboot and get "PLATINUM SAMPLE" is a diferent thing from the normal reboot at the end of diagnostic, this is a bug happening at the start of the diagnostic and it happened with RC4 and 1.2.0.1 Patch A and it was a BIOS compatibility issue and you fixed it. Now 1.2.0.2 is doing the same bug, downgrading to Patch A BIOS, diagnostic runs fine and I get the normal reboot at the end.
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-24 22:47:05 +0000 UTCNope, I always read every manual and I know this is not an usual "noob not reading the manual" error. I already try diferent activation order and doing the guide order (Autostart with OS, CTR Hybrid OC, Activate P1-P2-PX) and RC5 dont autostart with OS every time I restart, I tried both latest AGESA BIOS, 1.2.0.1 Patch A and 1.2.0.2.
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-24 22:43:53 +0000 UTCread the manual - everything will work
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 21:48:03 +0000 UTCI can confirm BIOS AGESA 1.2.0.2 is not fully compatible and I get a reboot and "PLATINUM SAMPLE" bug while Im running Diagnostic... downgraded to AGESA 1.2.0.1 Patch A and this is working better but also "Autoload with OS" is not working and I need run the program every time I restart (I saved states and options before and after enable and it was working fine with previous versions).
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-24 21:33:44 +0000 UTCI am receiving the same errors above, but if I adjust the PPT then the BIOS allows for more watts, then hard resets because the temperature went over the AMD default limitation. ASUS Dark Hero Ryzen 5950X
Dizziee
2021-04-24 21:27:23 +0000 UTCI get the same "Platinum sample" result after reboot and a lot of random crashes while playing games. It's strange because i only had a Silver Sample on RC4 and was always stable with the standard diagnostic profiles.
zeroblu3
2021-04-24 19:32:48 +0000 UTCLet us know how it goes please :)
Harry Fuller
2021-04-24 19:11:22 +0000 UTCSame problem, reboot and "PLATINUM SAMPLE" diagnostic after reboot... last time that I got this was a BIOS compatibility issue in RC4, AGESA 1.2.0.1 Patch A had problems and gave me same issue with RC4. Im gonna test a diferent BIOS version.
PewWORKS TV
2021-04-24 18:43:04 +0000 UTCok, llc3 = 2.7% in avx now at 1.1v instead of 4300 it is 4275 at ob10, at ob 30 it is 4300 and only at ob40 it is 4325. I don't understand a bit :) (at Ob = 0 I have 4300 set)
Sisay
2021-04-24 15:58:43 +0000 UTCJust to add.. I have tried 2 different motherboards and both performed identically. Maybe the processor is faulty..
Harry Fuller
2021-04-24 15:33:18 +0000 UTCOB creates the maximum resulting frequency. The base profile should not create the maximum frequency. Look in the manual.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 15:13:32 +0000 UTCIf it's a single message, yes.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 15:12:16 +0000 UTC"PCI-MUTEX holding time has expired! Sending a command in an insecure way!" is this normal?
zeroblu3
2021-04-24 14:35:35 +0000 UTCHey Yuri, thanks for the great app, unfortunately it is problematic as have previous version been, I can't figure out why. Is it normal for the computer to do a hard restart just after the 5th test in diag? This is about 3 minutes after the diag is started. ALL stress tests are fine I run before, no WHEA errors until the hard restart happens in diag where Windows will log 1 or 2 WHEA 18 errors. I have never been able to get the diag in any version to finish and create proper profiles. After restart, always I get Platinum Sample - it's clearly incorrect. All BIOS/Win/driver updates are done with clean Win install. BIOS settings are changed as the by the guide and I have calculated 1.7% after 'Turbo' LLC is applied. ***ClockTuner for Ryzen 2.1 RC5 by 1usmus*** AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor GIGABYTE X570 AORUS PRO BIOS ver. F33g SMU ver. 56.50.00 TABLE ver. 3672069 DRAM speed 3600 MHz 04/24/2021 15:55:08 P1 15:55:08: RSP TIME-OUT AFTER 0 DATA 253 FREQ CCX1# 0MHz FREQ CCX2# 0MHz VID# 1050mV Usage trigger# 81% OB CCX1# 0 OB CCX2# 0 P2 FREQ CCX1# 4550MHz FREQ CCX2# 4500MHz VID# 1150mV Usage trigger# 29% OB CCX1# 0 OB CCX2# 0 PX FREQ HIGH# 4825MHz FREQ MID# 4775MHz FREQ LOW# 4675MHz VID HIGH# 1375mV VID MID# 1375mV VID LOW# 1350mV OB HIGH# 0 OB MID# 0 WriteLog OB LOW# 0 Usage trigger# 8% PX OB LIMIT# 100MHz System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file ' Phoenix - hello there :) CTR completed diagnostic in alternative mode DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor CPU VID: 1200 CPU TEL: 0 Max temperature: 60° Energy efficient: Infinity Your CPU is PLATINUM SAMPLE Recomended CCX delta: 0 Theoretical maximum CCX delta: 25 Recomended values for overclocking (P1 profile): Reference voltage: 1050 mV Reference frequency: 3975 MHz Recomended values for overclocking (P2 profile): Reference voltage: 1250 mV Reference frequency: 4325 MHz Recomended values for undervolting: Reference voltage: 1000 mV Reference frequency: 3875 MHz Phoenix deactivated!
Harry Fuller
2021-04-24 14:34:56 +0000 UTCSomething edited in the exe ?
unknown123
2021-04-24 14:32:43 +0000 UTCI got very inconsistent results comparing the RC5 ver 11 and the "new build"- something is not right- 5950x "platinum sample - once 5025 px profile, the second time 4900 with exact same bios settings- come on
famich2005
2021-04-24 13:50:17 +0000 UTChttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1BEtS864GGw75vZpWDbwodB7vqErPqT6J/view?usp=sharing
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 13:39:12 +0000 UTCI'll make a separate exe for you
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 13:21:59 +0000 UTCAll the options in the "Tuner" tab are grayed out for me. Am i missing something? Previous version worked great. edit: nvm ..a simple reboot apparently solved the problem ^^
zeroblu3
2021-04-24 12:44:43 +0000 UTCI have never touched, or customized the voltages on my processor, the only options that I touched are only those of the guide for the proper functioning of CTR. Soon I need to install my computer from scratch, I will try again. I will avoid any breakage of my hardware for the moment. >.< The cuz can be my power supply maybe, no ? ^^
unknown123
2021-04-24 12:20:41 +0000 UTCYou have a critical power failure on your processor. VRM is not responding and is frying your CPU. The only cause is a custom voltage setting ( CPU voltage must always be in Auto) in the BIOS or is this a problem with the engineering product.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 12:10:00 +0000 UTCYeah maybe, i really don't know what happen, i remember, CTR 1.1 worked fine with my system in the past (or maybe with my x370), but now i try with CTR 1.1 and the same thing happen. The temp's reach the limit only when CB20 is launched, without that, i have a "PLATINUM SAMPLE", but it's really not accurcy anymore. My motherboard don't have any blue connector on the back, i buyed him on my favorite market. ^^ I don't know if i have a problem somewhere, but my system work really fine. :/
unknown123
2021-04-24 12:04:34 +0000 UTCThis value is only relevant for the AMD base boost.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 11:58:36 +0000 UTCThanks!
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 11:58:02 +0000 UTCInfo for me :) all fine
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 11:57:58 +0000 UTCThanks for the test. It looks very good.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 11:57:32 +0000 UTCAt this point the problem exists only with your system . I assume that you have an engineering motherboard. I had an engineering Godlike. There are blue connectors on the back of the board. Either way there is nothing I can do about it.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 11:52:37 +0000 UTCSo ive done with my initial testing for CTR 2.1 RC5 build 15. Comparing threadscaling in Cinebench R20 just like i did last time. These were my previous results: PBO CO benchmode: (ambient ~ 20 degrees) Bios 3003, which have the best PBO CO boosting behavior of all asus bioses 1 thread = 662 points 2 threads = 1303 points 4 threads = 2444 points 6 threads = 3706 points 8 threads = 4887 points 10 threads = 5974 points 12 threads = 7022 points 14 threads = 7906 points 16 threads = 8645 points 20 threads = 9583 points ...seems like i didn't save 24 thread screenshot, but 105xx score 32 threads = 12238 points CTR 2.04 hotfix: (ambient ~ 24 degrees) Bios 3003, but dont matter since using CTR 1 thread = 652 points 2 threads = 1295 points 4 threads = 2525 points 6 threads = 3752 points 8 threads = 4979 points 10 threads = 6016 points 12 threads = 7171 points 14 threads = 8287 points 16 threads = 8831 points 20 threads = 9539 points 24 threads = 10217 points 28 threads = 11117 points 32 threads = 12032 points LLC4 = upto 2% vdroop PX high = from 1 to 2 threads @ 5050mhz PX mid = from 3 to 4 threads @ 4950mhz PX low = from 5 to 9 threads @ 4900mhz P2 = from 10 to 20 threads @ 4800/4675mhz P1 = from 21 to 32 threads @ 4700/4600mhz Results from CTR 2.1 RC5 Latest bios 3501 for these runs, which i did all back-to-back (could gain a few points with restarts between runs) 1 thread = 668 points 2 threads = 1302 points 4 threads = 2528 points 6 threads = 3800 points 8 threads = 4999 points 10 threads = 6081 points 12 threads = 7187 points 14 threads = 8185 points 16 threads = 8963 points 20 threads = 9540 points 24 threads = 10031 points 28 threads = 11044 points 32 threads = 12064 points LLC4 = upto 2% vdroop PX high = from 1 to 2 threads @ 5050mhz PX mid = from 3 to 4 threads @ 4950mhz PX low = from 5 to 9 threads @ 4900mhz P2 = from 10 to 20 threads @ 4775/4650mhz P1 = from 21 to 32 threads @ 4700/4600mhz Settings can be found in imgur link below: (noteworthy: L3 latency is only 9.8ms and these settings survived 5 iteration of IBT very high which is a 270watt load at these speeds) Full set of screenshots can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/JmgrHWm#Tyg7R8P CTR 2.1 RC5 seems indeed to be working nicely even in a "medium-workload" as Cinebench, but it is in the "light-workloads" / games that will benefit the most from this update.
domdtxdissar
2021-04-24 11:48:15 +0000 UTCHey it's me again ! :) So again, my 3900x - MSI X570 Godlike don't work on CTR, i had downgraded and do multiple things, but that don't work, the temperature reach the limite like 3s (90°+). So i can't use the CTR properly. :( The log : ***ClockTuner for Ryzen 2.1 RC5 by 1usmus*** AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) BIOS ver. 1.D3 SMU ver. 46.70.00 TABLE ver. 2361347 DRAM speed 3600 MHz 04/24/2021 13:07:23 P1 FREQ CCX1# 0MHz FREQ CCX2# 0MHz FREQ CCX3# 0MHz FREQ CCX4# 0MHz VID# 1175mV Usage trigger# 81% OB CCX1# 0 OB CCX2# 0 P2 FREQ CCX1# 0MHz FREQ CCX2# 0MHz FREQ CCX3# 0MHz FREQ CCX4# 0MHz VID# 1275mV Usage trigger# 30% OB CCX1# 0 OB CCX2# 0 PX FREQ HIGH# 4450MHz FREQ MID# 4400MHz FREQ LOW# 4350MHz VID HIGH# 1450mV VID MID# 1425mV VID LOW# 1400mV OB HIGH# 0 OB MID# 0 OB LOW# 0 Usage trigger# 12% PX OB LIMIT# 100MHz 13:07:23: RSP TIME-OUT AFTER 0 DATA 253 MODE RSMU CMD 5 ARG 0 Phoenix ready! Cinebench R20 started 13:08:22: Cinebench stopped! Temperature limit reached! 90,3° Cinebench R20 finished with result: 0 Voltage: 0.968 V PPT: 28 W Temperature: 47.2° Temperature limit reached! 91,2°
unknown123
2021-04-24 11:18:45 +0000 UTCThis is unbelievable work!!
Jake Mormile
2021-04-24 10:11:51 +0000 UTCI have a lot of these entries in the log: ***ClockTuner for Ryzen 2.1 RC5 by 1usmus*** AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO BIOS ver. 3402 SMU ver. 56.50.00 TABLE ver. 3672069 DRAM speed 3800 MHz 04/24/2021 11:22:30 11:23:14: RSP TIME-OUT AFTER 0 DATA 253 MODE RSMU CMD 5 ARG 0 What does it means? Thank you for your hard work!
Marco Wirths
2021-04-24 09:31:35 +0000 UTCJust one thing i'm wondering about, in HWInfo, it shows that my Power Reporting Deviation is at 995% at times (which is obviously past the maximum 100%). Is this of any concern I should be looking into?
84wayz
2021-04-24 07:17:45 +0000 UTCJust updated from R3 to the new R5. Excellent work! seamlessly scanned my 5900X and set the profiles. Platinum edition, running smoothly at a much lower voltage, so better cooling at slightly better clockspeeds. I'm very satisfied with this edition. Thank you for the hard work Yuri. It's getting better and better.
84wayz
2021-04-24 07:15:32 +0000 UTCSo is my CPU a good sample or was it just an error?
J
2021-04-24 07:12:31 +0000 UTCI will remove these words in the next release, they do not mean anything
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 06:53:09 +0000 UTCYes, the values for the profiles are a bit lower than before. This is done so that when you start a heavy load the system will not reboot. You can even use a 3800 frequency and you will have the maximum boost. The base profile is just a guide for dynamic system, it's not the final frequency
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-24 06:49:47 +0000 UTCThat's a good reminder, thank you
Michael S
2021-04-24 06:45:40 +0000 UTCI'm still having random reboots even with the lowest PX values. I might go back to RC3, which was the most stable version for me. LOL.
Norman P. Aquino
2021-04-24 05:20:33 +0000 UTCJust do it again. I experienced the same thing -- my CPU instantly became a Platinum copy. LOL. I'm still trying to make this CTR version work for me. I've been having random reboots even with the lowest PX values.
Norman P. Aquino
2021-04-24 05:15:49 +0000 UTCHi Yuri, the diagnostics values have been quite low as always, however I know what my stable numbers for RC4 were. Am I okay to feed those into the profiles with RC5 or will it push me over the edge? Thank you.
Tanveer Jugpal
2021-04-24 03:06:37 +0000 UTCNow is working (who knows what was the problem)I restarted all from beginning.i Get to 5G with High mV 1435 and OB High mV 130 is that safe?and if i can ask 1 more question..How to lower core clocks for idle and low level desktop/surfing etc "work"?now is 3400mhz when is idle but i want lower then that like 2000mhz or 1800 can i do that?Thanks for all your help
Marko Todorovic
2021-04-23 23:06:39 +0000 UTCQuick question regarding my Diagnostic Run. So the diagnostic run for a 5900X resulted in a reboot and then when CTR 2.1 RC5 automatically resumes from where it was interrupted, the diagnostic results say “Plantinum Sample - Efficiency: Infinity”, but the associated values it provides for each profile are extremely low and there is no new Diagnostic Voltage provided in the results to replace the default diagnostic voltage. I assume there must have been some error, as I haven’t seen many/any references to Platinum Sample Ryzen 5900X, unless I missed them in the guides/documentation you have on the Patreon page. Any help/feedback is appreciated! Thank you in advance and thank you for all the work you put into your programs!
J
2021-04-23 22:31:20 +0000 UTCThis is the version i've waited for! First version for me with real benefit for my 5600x. Great work Yuri!
Kegel
2021-04-23 21:49:23 +0000 UTCBest version so far ... i kept ppt auto because every lvl i try will crash my pc
Boyousuf
2021-04-23 21:45:53 +0000 UTCWhen I got that error I immediately rebooted into my bios and checked. All were enabled. I turned CMS back on (double checked to make sure they were still enabled) and then rebooted. The only difference was me enabling CMS. I didn't get the error again and everything's running smoothly.
Setherio
2021-04-23 21:22:10 +0000 UTCThis is not a harmless error, it means that Windows does not see the tags of your cores.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:16:52 +0000 UTCTry restarting your computer, in most cases it helps
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:15:59 +0000 UTCGreat work as always Yuri! One error I did come across (which I didn't have with the "test version" which was this came up during first run. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating system does not see CPPC core tags! CPPC, CBP, Cool & Quiet and Preferred cores should be ENABLED! Also try reinstalling the chipset driver. ***ClockTuner for Ryzen 2.1 RC5 by 1usmus*** AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor GIGABYTE X570 AORUS ULTRA BIOS ver. F33h SMU ver. 56.50.00 TABLE ver. 3672325 DRAM speed 3600 MHz 04/23/2021 13:39:16 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Those were set to "Enable" (and not "Auto" or "Default"). The only thing I could think of was I had turned CMS off in order to get Resizable Bar running (as that option only appears when CMS is off). So I went into my BIOS and turned it back on. Didn't receive an error again. But it makes me wonder if CMS off removes those features? They were "Enabled" with "CMS Off" (at showed, in bios set to enabled). Just find it a little odd this error took place with the RC5 official and not RC5 testing (or maybe testing wasn't looking for it? Perhaps just an odd glitch?)
Setherio
2021-04-23 21:14:29 +0000 UTCThis is great news! :)
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:13:43 +0000 UTCMake sure all profiles are activated successfully, then check which PX preset you are using and which PX OB LIMIT. I think your PX OB LIMIT limits the frequency, just change this value
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:13:05 +0000 UTCHWiNFO does not use mapping to copy data, sometimes you may see similar results :)
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:10:50 +0000 UTCNew guide is updated recommendations. The old guide contains answers to frequently asked questions.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:09:29 +0000 UTCThe processor allows, therefore there is also a boost. You need to provide a normal LLC, otherwise you will have problems with heavy stress tests. You need them if you work in very heavy avx.
Yuri Bubliy
2021-04-23 21:07:39 +0000 UTCAll working, so far so good! One thing I have noticed though, getting bizarre readings on Hwinfo, apparently one of my cores is now running at 65,553Mhz! Noice ;)
Morgan Ring
2021-04-23 20:00:28 +0000 UTCHello.I have a question.How to make 5ghz or 4.9 in PX Profile?i tried to change to that but it always 4800 4850.i set OB to 50 or 100 but nothing change.What im doing wrong? Im new to all this(my CPU is ryzen 5950x)i tried to change high mv from 1375 to 1.4 but again nothing changes when i click calculate.Thank you
Marko Todorovic
2021-04-23 19:35:55 +0000 UTCJust FYI I noticed reading the new CTR 2.1RC5 manual compared to the "big guide" RC4, that it had some settings mentioned in it that I didn't recall from the RC4 guide to set in the BIOS (listed on page 7 in the RC5 manual). I set those up, notably the VDDG IOD (which I had on auto before) to the suggested value and my stability improved. So double check the BIOS settings with this new manual.
Jeff Weinstein
2021-04-23 18:23:34 +0000 UTCIncredible work. Just loaded it up. I had a few intermittent PC crashes with RC4 so I'm excited to see if RC5 is more stable for me.
Kryptonic
2021-04-23 18:14:41 +0000 UTCI set p1 1.1v 4300 and 4200 MHz. I set Ob 10, cinebench boost 50 MHz, corona boost 50 MHz - nice. I am running prime and again boost 50 and error core. Why is boost also at prime?
Sisay
2021-04-23 17:37:06 +0000 UTCDude. This release just improved my FPS by about 10-20 in World of Warcraft in heavily congested zones. Whereas once I got around 80ish with a ton of players on screen, I now get about 100. Amazing improvement over an already great previous release.
Jeff Weinstein
2021-04-23 17:25:25 +0000 UTC
