I'm a huge fan of high-kv motors. I run RCX 2205/2633kv now and love them. Just don't over-prop them and you'll be fine.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:59:07 +0000 UTC
P.S. Received email
Hayden de Dulin
2016-05-13 18:55:41 +0000 UTC
Cool. Is that part on the stack an osd? I'd put money on it that it's for cam and vtx, or do I? Look forward to seeing 2600kv's as I have some in the mail. Was tossing up between lb pros and kiss. Thought I'd give kiss a try.
Hayden de Dulin
2016-05-13 18:54:43 +0000 UTC
Just received an email notification
SpoonFPV
2016-05-13 18:48:57 +0000 UTC
You're right. It's the details of the port that the designer asked me to obscure.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:37:11 +0000 UTC
got the mail. the covered part looks like a connection port
Zoran
2016-05-13 18:33:30 +0000 UTC
Does that work well?
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:28:38 +0000 UTC
Something to keep in mind looking at those traces. If the board that's actually flying gets any wiggles that make it into the motor signals they'll show up in the secondary's traces even though it's not it's fault.
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:27:44 +0000 UTC
Oh I get it, you just want to compare the traces from the two gyro chips on an identical flight. Not actually change which board is flying the quad.
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:24:26 +0000 UTC
Correct. With foam tape underneath for padding and isolation.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:23:27 +0000 UTC
Is there any heat shrink on those ESCs? Looks like just e-tape.
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:22:56 +0000 UTC
Actually, I may just stack the boards and run them both in passive mode, on a copter that is already built. The key information is the gyro data really. If there is a substantial difference in the gyro data, that is what matters.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:22:31 +0000 UTC
In real life, of course there will only be one flight controller in the stack. In my testing, one flight controller will be active, and one will be passive. The passive one will have no motor outputs hooked up to it. It will get a parallel feed of the SBUS signal so that it knows when to arm and start recording.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:21:45 +0000 UTC
In real life, of course there will only be one flight controller in the stack. In my testing, one flight controller will be active, and one will be passive. The passive one will have no motor outputs hooked up to it. It will get a parallel feed of the SBUS signal so that it knows when to arm and start recording.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:21:45 +0000 UTC
Yeah for sure. The designer is also considering inventing a new OSD module, but for launch he says he is going to make a "carrier" module for a micro minimOSD, similar to how the X4R will slot into the receiver module.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:19:49 +0000 UTC
So you'll be able to switch which FC is active in the stack?
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:19:35 +0000 UTC
I had my eye on that stack from the start of the vid. Looks pretty slick.
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:18:55 +0000 UTC
I got am email notification. Thanks for your very cool videos Joshua.
Michael Wesemann
2016-05-13 18:12:37 +0000 UTC
Ok thanks. Still figuring out how Patreon works.
Joshua Bardwell
2016-05-13 18:11:44 +0000 UTC
I got an email Joshua.
Robert Craig Quillen
2016-05-13 18:09:49 +0000 UTC
Dear Patrons: did you get an email notification for this post, or do you have to come here manually to see it?