Hey folks,
We are going to record a Decoding Academia tomorrow and might make this one a preview open to all as it is a little bit of a primer for a forthcoming Huberman episode.
Specifically, we are going to look at a study from 2011 that Huberman recently promoted that essentially argues that when men smell sad tears from women they are less sexually aroused.
It's a bit of a strange paper but it appeared in Science in 2011 and has some interesting components that make it an interesting case study. Specifically, it includes a bunch of different measures (self-report, physiological measures, and neuroimaging) that appear to triangulate the same result. It also seems to have taken a lot of effort to control for confounds. And yet... I think there are a lot of clear indicators as to why, even before the later failed replication, people should have been skeptical of the results.
If you would like to play along the study is attached or you can find positive coverage of it from the time it was released, here: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/tears-as-chemical-signals-smell-of-female-tears-affects-sexual-behaviour-of-men
Christopher Kavanagh
2023-05-31 07:54:32 +0000 UTCTeres Hallman
2023-05-30 09:04:08 +0000 UTCDaniel
2023-05-30 08:18:50 +0000 UTCMe
2023-05-29 11:27:00 +0000 UTC