Upsetting Day: William Wegman's Sensual Dogs đ
Added 2023-08-07 12:00:07 +0000 UTC
Sometimes when a grifter grifts, itâs actually our fault. They were simply putting a product on the market, and it was the public who fell for it so hard it became a grift. For instance, I know art is subjective, but there was a time in the â90s when everyone flipped their shit for pictures of haunted dogs dressed as people. Everyone was so willing to pay big money for high fashion nightmare dog photos that newer work from the artist is currently selling for around twenty thousand U.S. dollars.

William Wegmanâs dog with peopleâs body photos suddenly appeared one day in every midwestern grandmotherâs bathroom at once. I get that placementâ that is clearly where these dogs belong, but theyâre also somehow considered high-fashion works of art. The dogs were in Vogue magazine multiple times. Anna Wintour let them into the Met Gala before Kim Kardashian, probably. I find it hilarious that the first man with a fancy degree in art to come up with putting a hat on a dog was able to make a billion dollars.

Wegman did commercial stuff like the Honda commercial where dogs with human hands love Honda. Honestly, not a selling point if you ask me. If Honda attracts dogs with peopleâs bodies, Iâm staying the fuck away from that brand. I guess Iâm the only sane person looking to purchase an affordable, family-friendly vehicle that mutants wonât attack. I just want a car that self-destructs when it detects dog minotaurs. The William Wegman stuff that I find funniest is when he gets very serious and turns his critical artistâs eye on the dog hats, like in his coffee table book of fashion photographs.

To make sure theyâre as artistic as possible, William took all of the photographs on the most inconvenient device possible, a 240-pound Polaroid 20X24 camera. It had to be rented from Polaroid and hauled around along with lighting equipment, drying racks, and generators in a rented box truck. Wegman said the camera was âunforgiving,â and he would take around 30-50 prints at a time, resulting in 2-3 photos he considered worth showing. All of this for something available 900 times a second on Tiktok today. Iâm glad I was born in an era where silly dog photos are so accessible and donât have the tone of a lich welcoming adventurers into its tomb.

Can you imagine watching someone unload this enormous, complicated piece of equipment, spend hours perfecting the lighting, prepare eighteen pounds of film, and boot up a generator to create a perfect photo? Then you find out that all of that effort was to take a weirdly horny picture of some not-quite-done-Animorphing dog in a designer dress. All of that for a photo so cursed even wikifeet wonât rate it? No matter how many times William Wegman asks?

The photo above is titled âMelissa,â which is the most upsetting possible title for it. Donât name the dog woman youâve created! She does look like a Melissa, though. I have to give him that. Other dog women photos are titled âMiss Mythical,â âNurse, Nurse,â and âGlamour Puss.â If I were William Wegmanâs agent, I would suggest his next coffee table book be called William Wegman Just The Horny Ones because weirdly spicy dog/human hybrids are a real under-examined throughline in all of his work. At first, I thought that wasnât Williamâs fault. Heâs a photographer who gives people what they want, and the people were clamoring for these sexy dog pics. âLet us watch Melissa pee,â they definitely hissed.
This man walked into Saks Fifth Avenue one day and said, âIâm going to make a book full of dogs in designer outfits. Would you like me to feature the clothing you sell and thank you in the acknowledgments?â and Saks Fifth Avenue agreed to this arrangement. They handed that man a Dolce & Gabbana Bikini and told him to go nuts. Itâs not his fault that the world has enabled his bad impulses in this way. We are all guilty, each of us who didnât stop it.

Donât worry; itâs not just the girl dogs getting this treatment. Heâs also got the boy dogs looking dapper as hell. This photograph from 1999 entitled âOpeningâ highlights how the dog looking naturally sad is part of it. Wegman promises the dogs love putting on their freaky little outfits. That despair is just their face! Deep existential dread is part of their breeding. Thatâs what makes the pictures so funny!

My opinion of this whole sexy dog situation changed pretty severely after I read the introduction William Wegman wrote for his fashion book where he described his dog Battina as âsexy and girlish even in maturity and motherhood.â This would be a creepy thing to say about a woman, but if youâre saying it about a female dog, itâs, hang on, let me check, worse. Yes, thatâs worse. In fact, he doesnât seem able to describe a dog in a way that doesnât sound like itâs a DJ introducing a burlesque dancer, a horrifying dog-headed burlesque monster.

He describes his male dog named Chundo as âthe ultimate man, masculine and lordly.â Chip is âa mere boy, but a devastatingly handsome one. His precious adolescence conveys an uncomplicated look of innocence seldom seen in the pages of todayâs fashion magazines. Chip is the Hellenic Golden Age, the âDavidâ of dogs.â He could have saved a lot of time by just saying the dog was hot. We get it, dude; you think the dog is hot. Why donât you take some erotic photos about it? Oh, wait:

I personally enjoy some of the less horny William Wegman photos. A lazy Wegman is great. If my photos sold for 20K a pop, I would relish the days that I could phone it in. I would feel like I deserved to be able to do a few lazy ones, and hey, maybe they only sell for a jet-ski price instead of a full boat. So, when I see a picture thatâs just a forced perspective of a small dog standing on a regular dog, I finally understand the medium, and that makes me feel like a fancy art lady in a way that a dog in a bikini doesnât.

Thereâs a finite amount of creativity the human brain is capable of. Some days the only innovation you have in you isâŠwhat if we put two hats on the dog? Could you charge twice as much for that photo? Why not try? Have the audacity, William Wegman! This is infinitely better than his other stuff. Iâm sorry for what I said earlier. Letâs keep adding more hats. The hats are great, actually.

Iâm sorry if Iâve ruined dogs with human bodies for you. A lot of people have fond memories of these little creeps from their segments on Sesame Street. They used to do whole sketches as fun little monsters who taught kids valuable lessons like how to steal eggs out of a bowl or how to make direct eye contact with the dark void of death on the distant horizon.

I hope thatâs how youâre able to remember the Wegman dogs. Wegmanâs evolution to the world of artistic, sexy, fashion dogs makes me think maybe evolution is bad after all. Laurels can be a great place to rest. If he had stopped at Sesame Street, his career wouldnât have this haunting final footnote attached.

So many artistsâ careers these days start making quality content and end selling feet pics. Itâs the new circle of artistic life! Which I guess means this Patreon is about to get weird. Stay tuned!

âŠ
This article was brought to you by our fine sponsor and Hot Dog Supreme: Hambone, the courageous WikiFeet editor who saw William Wegmanâs were-dog feet and said âno, this institution will retain its dignity.â
You can read this article and every other one on the much better in every way 1900HOTDOG.COM.
Comments
Apparently every nightmare Iâve ever had was just a repressed memory of something from the 90s!
Zach Dewoody
2023-08-08 01:47:33 +0000 UTCThat brings fullmetal alchemist bad memories tho
Elgofo
2023-08-07 22:59:40 +0000 UTCYup, i won this round of « spot the real foot fetichist », they are here
Elgofo
2023-08-07 22:57:46 +0000 UTCLet's see who gets this reference: "Sorry, Doggy Two-Hats"
Daphne Lawless
2023-08-07 22:43:28 +0000 UTCOh god the dog minotaurs from the car commercials weren't a one off thing......fuck.
Flippant Sausage
2023-08-07 20:18:41 +0000 UTCHawhaw these photos are just tickling me I will suggest he does a calendar of dogs of different cub and boy scout ranks that would just be so cute I think
sissyneck
2023-08-07 20:04:20 +0000 UTCOne thing about the 1990s is that we didn't have total information awareness, we just saw odd things in passing and didn't know their history. The scenario: you and your friend are teenagers, about to go on a camping trip. He has stashed some gear in the garage of his aunt, a middle aged lady who is like 30 or something. She is divorced and works as a part time librarian. You stop by her house, and she invites you in. "Can I get you anything to drink? No sugar or artificial sweetners, of course!" she says as she ushers you into the living room. Hanging on one wall is a picture of a dog in a business suit. You and your friend chuckle at it, and she playfully says "oh that? I got that on a trip to Kansas City, funny isn't it?" And then you sip your cranberry juice, pack the car, and never think about it again.
Matthew Harris
2023-08-07 18:53:21 +0000 UTCI DO remember these beasts from Sesame Street! It was weird then. It's werider now.
Devin Eagles
2023-08-07 18:42:12 +0000 UTCThe fake eyes and green swim fins? That is appalling, unless you grew up with it from childhood, in which case it could be a treasured memento. For the rest of us it's an uncanny horror that can never be unseen.
Bonnybedlam
2023-08-07 17:03:19 +0000 UTCThese are the saddest Weimaraners I've ever seen. Is it the clothing that brings out the existential dread, or just belonging to Wegman? I'd almost want to see what this looked like with, say, a beagle, but there's at least a 50% chance I'd have to kill myself.
Bonnybedlam
2023-08-07 16:59:52 +0000 UTCSo not only did WikiFeet bring to heel the people who faked that AOC nude, but they've been holding the line against these dog homunculi this whole time?! As our sole defenders?! And yet, we mock them when we should be walking instep with them. Perhaps the internet at large got off on the wrong "foot" with foot fetishists (pardon the pun), but hopefully we can bridge that gap going forward. I mean, if what Liddy says is true, we'll all be dipping our toes in those waters soon enough!
Rebecca Bieth
2023-08-07 15:26:21 +0000 UTC"1-900-SADDOG! 1-900-SADDOG! Our articles SLAM with maximum dread!"
Aaron Russell
2023-08-07 15:25:15 +0000 UTCNote to self: when the article says "Upsetting Day", do not eat anything while reading or you'll have to brush the taste of ash out of your mouth again.
FancyShark
2023-08-07 14:57:16 +0000 UTCOk folks, time for our daily prayer: "Dear God or Satan, please grant me the confidence and success of a mediocre white man with a specific fetish. Amen"
Vooster
2023-08-07 14:05:49 +0000 UTCYep, it's Upsetting Day all right. Mm-hmm. Yessir.
Skebotron
2023-08-07 13:53:23 +0000 UTCLiddy, great article about the rabbits I'm going to raise when we buy that farm, but for some reason it makes me think of weimaraners? Like I can't stop thinking dark thoughts of self-harm, but for some reason there are weimaraners watching, which is weird, because this article is entirely about how happy I'll be when we make our fortune. Anyway, I'll leave a more detailed comment later; I have to go staunch this weird bleeding from my eyes.
Brendan McGinley
2023-08-07 12:38:25 +0000 UTCIt's the vivid, electric-green frog -- now imagine it hovering over the table during every dinner of your childhood.
adlem
2023-08-07 12:18:48 +0000 UTCI checked, and it turns out that "the one with the eyes" does not narrow the options down in the slightest.
Steven Clark
2023-08-07 12:17:09 +0000 UTCMy family has an autographed picture of one of the dogs (I think either Batty or Fay) as a frog, and I treasure it with all my heart (autographed by Wegman, not the dog). Just google "william wegman frog" -- you'll know it when you see it. It's the one with the eyes.
adlem
2023-08-07 12:08:18 +0000 UTC