Learning Day: How to Murder Your Wife 🌭
Added 2022-03-14 12:01:02 +0000 UTCSometimes when you see a movie from the 1960s with all of those glamorous costumes, elaborate sets, and live animals, you think, wow, they would never make this today! Then there are times when you see a movie from the 1960s with those glamorous costumes and those scenes where a man drugs two women for a bit and convinces a jury that murder should be legal if your wife is really annoying, and you think thank God they would never make this today! Related: check out this authentic movie poster for How To Murder Your Wife, complete with the insinuation that you poison women via the vagina? Or try strangling! There are five great options, starring Jack Lemmon; in Technicolor!
In 1965 the best way to lure a woman to a movie theater was with threats! A second tagline for this movie was, "Bring the little woman. Maybe she'll die laughing!" This makes perfect sense as a marketing strategy for this movie because its thesis is that women aren't afraid enough of men.
Society would be better if only women were more afraid of men. Who would write that? A maniac on the inside of a used pizza box in Times Square? No, How To Murder Your Wife is the first feature film from the screenwriter who adapted Breakfast At Tiffany's and The Manchurian Candidate into movies. Unpleasant fact: both of those movies featured white men playing Asians in ways that had even the ancient people of the '60s saying, "Hold on, whoa, wait a second."
How to Murder Your Wife is categorized as a dark comedy, but it's way darker today than in 1965. If there was a This Has Aged Poorly Olympics, How To Murder Your Wife would steal all of the medals and smelt them into a golden statue of a man slapping a woman on the ass while winking.
It's also, and I'm used to using this term as only the highest compliment, extremely gay. The main character, Stanley Ford, is a bachelor who lives with, as the movie constantly refers to him, "his man." Every day his man greets him after work with a martini in a chilled glass. His man cooks for him, cleans for him, and otherwise does all of the things a bachelor would normally need a wife for. How can Stanley Ford afford a man? He's in the bustling media business, which will surely never collapse.
Stanley draws spy cartoons, but he always acts them out first, which is why the first woman we see in this movie is being removed from a shipping container. She's a storage device for a belly button diamond that contains spy microfilm. "Women: Better than Tupperware Because You Can French Them" was another proposed tagline for this film.
Stanley Ford's bachelorhood is interrupted when he impulsively marries the stripper from his friend's stag party. Her name is, hahaha, she doesn't get a name. What is this 1996? Stanley never asks. Not at first, and then never for the entire movie. Everyone addresses her as Mrs. Ford and that’s how she’s credited.
Cake Woman has the most insane backstory in movie history. She's an Italian Miss Universe contestant whose clothes were stolen, and she was somehow forced to find a job wearing only a bathing suit and speaking no English. So stripper was the only job she could get? It feels like the studio bristled at the idea of an actual stripper involved in the plot of this movie, so they made her a silly Italian virgin who accidentally found herself covered in whipped cream and dancing as if Mr. Bean slipped on a banana peel into an erotic photoshoot.
Stanley is immediately trapped in this marriage. His lawyer says his wife hasn't given him grounds for divorce, and they already consummated the marriage, so his evil nemesis/beloved bride has Stanley right where she wants him. Because he's so invested in acting out all of his comics, Stanley has his spy main character get married too.
I really wanted to know how people reacted to this movie when it was released. I got that it was supposed to be a dark comedy but I couldn't tell if it was criticizing the feminist movement in the U.S. or men's reaction to the movement? It's hard to tell who the butt of the joke is in this movie, but maybe it was more apparent in 1965? I've googled How To Kill Your Wife so many times this week that if I were to disappear in a mysterious accident, my husband would be in big trouble.
I found a review from the New York Times, and it didn't help. It was mostly obsessed with how hot the actress who plays Cake Woman (Virna Lisi) is. They end by saying, "wait until the women see this picture-especially those who are not yet wed and those (alas, their name is legion) who haven't got what Miss Lisi has!" Which essentially translates to, "hoo boy ugly women will hate this movie, and there are a lot of ugly women out there." I think that provides the needed context for how things were going for women when this movie came out.
Stanley's life is turned upside down by his new wife, and so is his comic, which has changed from Bash Brannigan Spy to The Brannigans, a cute domestic story where Stanley is a bumbling idiot. He's miserable, but there's nothing he can do about it aside from something insane like, talk to his wife, maybe ask her name? MADNESS. The only thing a man should know about his wife is her blood type in case he ever needs a kidney.
Eventually he decides to regain some control over his life by murdering his wife in the comic. Since he always acts out his comics to make sure they are plausible, he has to plan the perfect murder. There’s this big deal about what a good murder he’s come up with and it turns out he’s just going to drug her and toss her in a cement machine at a construction site. This is the vanilla ice cream of murder plots and he’s so proud of himself.
He even walks by a store with a mannequin that looks like his wife, runs inside, and buys it. It's not a mannequin store. He walked into a normal clothing store and was like, "I'll give you any amount of money for the mannequin in the window. It looks just like my hot, hot wife." That's how committed to this fake murder he is. He's willing to make some poor store clerk the first person to look up mannequin fetish in the dictionary.
Then he drugs his wife with a fun party drug called "goofballs" that doctors in 1965 gave to any middle-aged white men who looked trustworthy. You know, the exact description of all serial killers. He also drugs his wife's shrill friend as a joke. He thought it would be funny, and he had the extra drugs, so why not! They both do silly dances on top of a piano and then pass out.
Stanley carries his wife out of the party, then switches her for the mannequin and crawls out the window of their townhouse to throw the dummy into a cement mixer while his man films the whole thing for non-mannequin fetish purposes (supposedly). Stanley stays up all night drawing the murder into the cartoon and then falls asleep next to it. Unknown to Stanley, his wife wakes up, sees the cartoon, and leaves him. He later tells his lawyer she must have gotten angry about "some little thing," AKA the fact that he murdered her in effigy.
Unfortunately, publicly debuting a murder plot for your hot wife right before she mysteriously disappears is not a great look. Some crazy people get it into their heads that Stanley murdered his wife, and they're weirdly uncool about it. Stanley can't prove his wife isn't dead because he doesn't seem to know a single piece of identifying information about her, including where she's from beyond the nation of Italy. He can't do much to find her beyond look in any big cakes he might run across, so he gets put on trial for her murder.
Now I'd like you to think of the darkest possible ending for this movie. It might be that Stanley gets the electric chair for murdering his wife because he couldn't ask her one simple question about herself. It might be a reveal that Stanley has a rare STD called junky penis that makes his penis absolutely terrible. It's still there, but it's bad, and everyone knows it just by looking at him. Or, it might be that Stanley admits to murdering his wife but talks the all-male jury into letting him off anyway, as a lesson to scare their wives into behaving lest they also be murdered, because that's what actually happens.
The men lift Stanley on their shoulders and carry him out of the courtroom in triumph, while the women, in one of the saddest scenes in cinema history, quietly stare into space and contemplate their mortality. The answer to how do we control these crazy women was right there all along. All we had to do was threaten to murder them! The world’s most effective negotiation strategy.
Stanley returns home to his happy bachelor life, only to find that his wife is back! His man points out that he can now legally murder her without being tried for the crime again because of double jeopardy laws. He also happens to have a gun on him, so he loads it up and hands it over, fully expecting Stanley to shoot this woman, but for some reason, Stanley doesn't murder his wife!
That's…a happy ending? I mean, he can still legally murder her at any time. That card is in his back pocket, but, yeah, it's a happy ending, I guess. And they all lived...well, they all lived!
...
This article was brought to you by our fine sponsor and Hot Dog Supreme, Tom Sekula: Who will now turn up on Google results for "how to murder your wife."
If these images are borked, you can read this article and every other one on the much better in every way 1900HOTDOG.COM.
Comments
Only when it's Phil Ken Sebben's house, yes.
petertron
2022-03-16 02:13:30 +0000 UTCRight? Hey, I burned down your house last year, so that means I get to burn it down whenever I want, right?
Katherine
2022-03-15 21:45:00 +0000 UTCYou're being very generous to assume that the strip isn't currently using hacked-up reruns from the 80s-90s archive, when our hero went into decline and his understudy began his less well-received early run
Lord Mo
2022-03-15 12:36:45 +0000 UTCI know I'm 55 years late, but my man, that's not how double jeopardy works
Sebben
2022-03-15 07:41:14 +0000 UTCI have honestly been thinking about this all day, especially in light of past HOTDOG articles. Because one of the things that has been discussed here is how Robocop was a satire of "tough on crime" that was embraced by its audience as being an unironic "tough on crime" movie. Meanwhile, Judge Dredd was a movie where the creators, including Sylvester Stalone didn't understand that they were making a satire. So what am I trying to figure out, is this movie something like Robocop/Judge Dredd in that either the people making it, or the audience, didn't understand what they were watching? Its been raining all day and I am just inside staring at the internet and trying to figure it out.
Matthew Harris
2022-03-15 07:14:47 +0000 UTCThere are a weird number of Hollywood films that hinge on misinterpreting “double jeopardy” to mean that, under very specific and convoluted circumstances, you get to do one free murder.
Robert Lee
2022-03-15 03:31:32 +0000 UTCThat Mr. Bean episode is nearly impossible to find. It aired precisely once after midnight in 1992. Rumour has it the Queen has the only copy and she watches it when she wants to, quote, "get juiced up".
petertron
2022-03-15 02:52:42 +0000 UTCAh, George Axelrod... he later went with The Darker Ending for his scabrous anti-everything masterpiece LORD LOVE A DUCK.
Steven Carlson
2022-03-14 23:41:04 +0000 UTCFor extra partner alertness, casually google "Hog farms near me".
Flippant Sausage
2022-03-14 22:22:56 +0000 UTCI get she's supposed to be a nude cake idiot and also Italian so she probably thought this was how American men show affection or order more cake, but it just breaks the heart to see an unloved nude cake idiot. Shelters don't take them, my dude. Nude cake idiots aren't just for the holidays.
Flippant Sausage
2022-03-14 22:18:50 +0000 UTCIn 1912-14 people had strong enough opinions that the women's suffrage movement in Great Britain and Ireland conducted a campaign of bombings, arson, and general street fights with the cops, so reacting to\being shitty about feminism is well on the table for a movie in 1969. Kind of high brow for a movie this dumb, so I can only assume this was the art someone wanted to make and their medium of choice was film AND casual but deeply rooted misogyny.
Flippant Sausage
2022-03-14 21:55:10 +0000 UTCMy apologies, I hope it didn't seem like I was trying to "Well, Actually". I guess the part that is more confusing and interesting to me, is that I was born in 1979, and I personally have only a vague idea about whether the movies/tv shows I grew up with in the 1980s/1990s were self-aware, so it is hard for me to imagine what people in the 1960s were thinking about. Even my parents were still in elementary school at the time!
Matthew Harris
2022-03-14 20:57:38 +0000 UTCI mean the word feminism was coined in 1837 along with the women's suffrage movement. Men and women started to really butt heads on gender roles after WW2 when women didn't want to give up the jobs they'd been filling when men were at war but specifically I was referring to second wave feminism which is generally considered to have started around 1961 when the FDA first approved oral contraception pills. That was well before this movie it was definitely in the culture at the time.
Lydia Bugg
2022-03-14 20:28:30 +0000 UTCOkay---there is a good chance that I don't know what I am talking about here, but I don't think a movie released in 1965 would have been a reaction to feminism. I don't think that feminism spread to popular culture for another 5 years, really. Like, maybe there was starting to be some interest in it in a few places, but I don't think it was widespread enough to be a movement, yet. Sometimes, discrimination in media comes as a backlash to when groups are getting more representation. And sometimes, like this, it is just because that society doesn't even think about these things at all. At least that is my guess. But it is hard to know, because this was a long time ago. The youngest person who saw this movie as an adult is...75 years old now.
Matthew Harris
2022-03-14 20:17:10 +0000 UTCBRENDAN.
Lydia Bugg
2022-03-14 19:38:50 +0000 UTCI like my women like I like my cursed artifacts: alive, officer.
Brendan McGinley
2022-03-14 16:41:50 +0000 UTCA 1960's double feature could be this and the movie "Goodbye Charlie". In this film, a womanizer falls off a boat, dies, and is immediately comes back as Debbie Reynolds. S/he has to learn to deal with sexually aggressive males (most of whom are his old drinking buddies). It is based on a play by George Axelrod so there is that.
Bill Culbertson
2022-03-14 16:16:36 +0000 UTCWhen the 60s say something is too much...
Talking Alpaca
2022-03-14 16:11:52 +0000 UTCYes, yes, of course the courts just set a precedent to legalize spousal murder, and Mrs Ford is married to a walking red flag for partner abuse, but you know who the real victims are? Young boys! Due to the malign influence of these loose women and the fact the author has literally no imagination, boys* lost out on a well researched spy comic strip filled with murders and intrigue, and instead got another run-of-the-mill comic about a married couple with an idiot husband. And you know comic strips... that married couple is never leaving the newspaper comic page. Never. It's probably still running today, and making topical jokes about the husband being confused by touchscreens. *and perhaps some poor deviant girls who haven't been properly trained in being ladylike.
The Parallel Viewmaster
2022-03-14 15:45:46 +0000 UTCI had to look up this movie because I couldn't believe it was real. Here's a nice tidbit from the TV Tropes page: "The film ends with the butler sheepishly closing the door on the audience as he is about to possibly have sex with the mother of his employer's wife." I mean, seriously, what the fuck? This is like ending Nightmare on Elm Street with a musical number about diabetes awareness. And going by the tone of the film, I have serious doubts it's going to be a consensual deal.
Pablo Rodriguez
2022-03-14 15:12:18 +0000 UTCI Learned something, yes, but this was also very Upsetting. I am unsure what day it is supposed to be. I think the header may be inaccurate.
Jeff Orasky
2022-03-14 14:46:00 +0000 UTCit's standard gear for all veterans of the Italian confectionary wars.
DeltaFoxtrot
2022-03-14 14:01:05 +0000 UTCWhat the giggity shit? Never before have I been so grateful to have been born in the 70s, a full decade after this nonsense came and went. It might also be the first movie covered by 1900Hotdog that I have no urge whatsoever to see for myself. Thank you, Liddy, for taking this particular bullet of misogyny for us and describing the pain so thoroughly.
Bonnybedlam
2022-03-14 13:09:32 +0000 UTCIs that a whipped cream dagger on Cake Woman’s hip? Can we standardize that?
FancyShark
2022-03-14 13:05:53 +0000 UTCyes my penologist told me that for workers comp purposes it should be termed "Harlequin Penis" and he agreed they should of put a warning or sticker on the new blade dryer when they installed it that said "Above the waist use only" or something to prevent a infection such as mine
sissyneck
2022-03-14 12:26:35 +0000 UTCI look forward to reading this on my break… I’m the meantime I wish I could see my wife’s face when this notification appears on her iPad. Keeps her on her toes.
Christopher Horne
2022-03-14 12:03:10 +0000 UTC