![Director's Commentary for π The Tale of Tiffany π [unedited]](https://img5.xaiju.com/storage/7/bs/bl/d38796-019e8ece-89ba-73c0-ac3a-af86f1973878.jpg)
Director's Commentary for π The Tale of Tiffany π [unedited]
Added 2021-08-09 22:35:37 +0000 UTCThis is the live version to watch right away, and the edited version will be up in a day or two.
Comments
Because Pedantry is fun and the topic is interesting .. a quick note on the spinning (I recommend the work of Ruth Goodman and Bret Devereaux for accessible introductions BTW) 1313 would have been a bit early for a Parisian woman to have had a spinning wheel (much less a treadle powered one like you show) She would have more likely had a distaff and spindle. The distaff was in fact a staff that held the wool and the spindle was a weight that helped draw it out to thread. Distaff is a word for women because for most of European history just about every woman would have gone about carrying one so she could spin thread while she did all the other work that was required of her.
Gabriel Nichols
2021-09-13 20:42:29 +0000 UTCAlso why is it that I can't access this post for example even though I'm in a higher tier than $3? https://www.patreon.com/posts/1664467 :(
Mona Celeste
2021-08-29 19:03:26 +0000 UTCWhere can we find the edited version?
Mona Celeste
2021-08-29 19:02:50 +0000 UTCIt's always weird to me when creators go "we had to cut this bit because less is more". It's not. More is more - I've done the maths. The Emma bit was most certainly worth leaving in! I can understand why something would be cut if it's incomplete, or confusing, but other than that I say make them as long as they are with all the complete non-confounding bits included!
John White
2021-08-12 23:51:40 +0000 UTC
