Which content format would you prefer?
Added 2025-11-21 11:55:56 +0000 UTCComments
Is there a place I can view all your works?
Zuther 12
2025-11-28 02:07:45 +0000 UTCThe number of images in the set does not affect my work pace in any way. In any case, I won't be able to publish 30 images a month like checkpik; my maximum is 3-4 images, otherwise I just risk losing my mind. The main problem with large sets is that I will most likely get tired of using the same character for several months, and this will reduce my involvement in the process. I also believe that image quality is always more important than quantity.
Foc Follet
2025-11-25 14:52:55 +0000 UTCSubscribed just to vote XD Considering your inconstancy, the best option would be either first variant (a main image with multiple variations) or the second one (2–5 photos in a set). If there are more than that, you'll likely either spend several months making them, or renders staging/quality will drop noticeably. Image quality is one of your biggest advantages (this will clearly affect the number of subscribers, if you care at all). There are tons of artists with poor or average-quality art, truly good and creative artists like you can be counted in the dozens, and in the niche of repulsive/gross men, there are literally just a handful p.s. a little example. There's an artist named bsmut, you've probably seen his work, he works in a similar genre, but with monsters. He has dozens of photos in his sets, short comics, and decent art, but his quality isn't up to yours in terms of staging, lighting, poses, and other small details. Then there's someone called cpick, whose sets are small, just a few photos each, but very, very high-quality. Of the two, i follow cpick solely because he has excellent content. I simply have no desire to follow to smut, despite his large sets. Subscribers will always want more and more and more, but figure out if you can do a lot, often, and well. Think about your capabilities
Shacka1
2025-11-23 20:21:35 +0000 UTC
