XaiJu
law
law

patreon


OA721: Lock Him Up 6: Evaluating the NY Charges Against Trump

Liz and Andrew evaluate the Trump indictment and answer listener questions as well as a Just Security article critiquing their position.

The Patreon bonus contains a deep dive into an Andrew Weissman statement on MSNBC on lesser-included offenses.

This is a paid post on Patreon.

Notes
INDICTMENT
https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

STATEMENT OF FACTS
https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-SOF.pdf

NY Crim Proc. ยง 30.10 (Statute of Limitations)
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/criminal-procedure-law/cpl-sect-30-10.html

NY Crim Law ยง 175.05
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/pen-sect-175-05.html

NY Crim Law ยง 175.10
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/penal-law/pen-sect-175-10.html

People v. Hankin
https://casetext.com/case/people-v-hankin

People v. Saporita
https://casetext.com/case/people-v-saporita-stevenson

Just Security article
https://www.justsecurity.org/85831/the-broad-scope-of-intent-to-defraud-in-the-new-york-crime-of-falsifying-business-records/

Comments

That was going to be my point as well. If the claim is that "you can't sure the President of the United States," then isn't Bragg able to claim equitable tolling until noon, Jan 20, 2021?

Jack Russell Weinstein

When it comes to tolling the limitations can't you just say Trump was president, we could not indict so it was paused.

Papa Fishy ๐ŸŸ


More Creators