OA479: No, Judges Should NOT Be Originalists, Part 2
Added 2021-04-05 07:37:55 +0000 UTCA recent episode of the Rationally Speaking Podcast featured Originalist Law professor William Baude arguing for why judges should be originalist. Needless to say, it was not a good case and strawman arguments abounded. Andrew is here to give us part 2 of the deep-dive that will set the record straight on why originalism is still bad.
Appearances
None, invite us on your show!
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Comments
Listening to the explanation of the T3BE answer, I was struck by this exchange: Thomas: I will have peed and I will walk out with the toilet paper on my foot, and it’ll be like “burglary!” Andrew: What you must have is you must illegally enter a building. Thomas: Yup. Andrew: That is prong one, and you must, number two... I have no idea how Thomas stopped himself from saying "Not number two - I just peed!" Maybe he's just not as juvenile as me.
The Fallacious Trump Podcast
2021-05-05 17:34:59 +0000 UTC
