#T3BE 212 - Full Question Text for Patrons
Added 2021-01-29 04:00:02 +0000 UTC
Comments
I pick A. It’s definitely not constructive eviction because she is still there and did not move out immediately. Further she only asked him once to fix it.
Jena Jones
2021-01-29 20:00:06 +0000 UTCAs I read this. She said that she would withhold rent but had not actually missed a rent payment at the time the landlord filed. So the landlord is violating the covenant of quiet enjoyment by filing for eviction (ps I had to look up covenant of quiet enjoyment so I cheated from a testing pov) because she had not yet missed the payment. I think she'll win but will still need to pay rent. All the stuff about ice cream and cooling system is noise. The only point is the landlord jumped the gun
John of the bankruptcy pirates
2021-01-29 18:04:10 +0000 UTCI think Thomas got it right for the wrong reason. I think it is d because the landlord started eviction w/o cause. Threatening to withhold rent is not the same as actually withholding.
John of the bankruptcy pirates
2021-01-29 18:01:37 +0000 UTC
