XaiJu
law
law

patreon


Sneak Peek of the Introduction to the OA Amicus Brief

Check out our statement of interest and introduction!  Comments welcome.

Comments

Ok from the updates I see this changed a lot. I’ll refrain from that kind of grammatical suggestion until the very end

Crockpot

Nitpick from a layperson who doesn’t know how these things are done typically: the very last sentence says “a criminal defendant that” but I think it should be “a criminal defendant who” since he is still (probably) a human person. Could also be “whom” since he’s the subject of that lesser clause but part of the object of the sentence as a whole. Never been great about that.

Crockpot

As a lay person, footnote at best, I don't think it adds anything to your credibility, as the author of the Amicus brief.

Dan from Deerfield


More Creators