Usually when I revisit a work I am repulsed by it. You are your worst critic after all. I have more projects that I prefer not to acknowledge than the ones I do. I remembered SGS falling in that category, however, in revisiting it to provide this commentary, I'm actually surprised with how cohesive it turned out. There were definitely elements that could stand for some improvement, but I think I did a fairly good job with making the theme cohesive, and I think the double meaning of Gail's final lines illustrate that pretty well.