Submissive Isn't a Synonym for Passive

A man we’ll obviously call Norman once wrote that submission is laziness. Subs do little more than stand in front of St Andrews crosses behaving like perpetually inert, brainless sex dolls. The rest of the time we lie around sighing like whimsical princesses. Hell, we can barely understand The Very Hungry Caterpillar. “Submissive” is a synonym for “passive”, so dominants would get more return on their time investment with a love dolls.

Norman, I’m getting tired of your nonsense. If you’re too

lazy

to gain an understanding what submission involves, maybe you aren’t made of the stuff you need to identify as a dominant. You’re in the market for a toy, not a sub, and there are about 100 million sites on the internet selling fleshlights, so you’re in luck. Please don’t waste the time of beings who are made of cells and flesh.

Norm, there are approximately seventy gazillion different kinds of sub, and most of them would have a lot to say about the “submission is laziness” trope. ShayBlondie would laugh if you told her you could handle suspensions with those wobbly “abs” of yours. RaindeGrey demonstrates a level of courage that ignorant dominants like yourself could never muster, and I’ll be damned if there’s a slut skill Nexxi hasn’t mastered. Do you think all these talents happen by themselves?

Sometimes, surrender means spending your emotional energy processing and confronting intensely harsh degradation or humiliation. Sometimes it means tolerating a level of pain most dominants would baulk at. Sometimes, it means service, which is a whole heap of hard bloody work. And sometimes, it means proactively learning things that your average sex worker can’t pronounce. Sometimes, submission means a lot of things, but it never, ever means laziness, much less passivity.