RT-900 Port Progress
Added 2025-04-17 19:18:42 +0000 UTCHi all
Conversion is still ongoing, it's much tougher than the H3->890 port due to the differences between the M0 and M4, why on earth couldn't Radtel have just used a Cortex M4? Sometimes, I just don't understand how these people think or come to these crazy decisions.
Here's the file converted so far
@make.h
xglobals.h
bandplan.h
bk4819.h
dtmf.h
rssi.h
subtone.h
calibration.h
channel.h
board.h
codedata.h
core.h
gpio.h
memory.h
eeprom.h
keypad.h
lcd.h
longpress.h
radio.h
Delay.h
general.h
rda5807.h
scan.h
scope.h
sound.h
voice.h
timers.h
protocol.h
uart.h
display.h
input.h
make.c
bandplan.c
bk4819.c
dtmf.c
rssi.c
subtone.c
calibration.c
channel.c
board.c
core.c
gpio.c
memory.c
eeprom.c
keypad.c
lcd.c
longpress.c
radio.c
Delay.c
general.c
rda5807.c
scan.c
scope.c
sound.c
voice.c
timers.c
protocol.c
uart.c
display.c
input.c
When you factor remaining source files and code adjustments, I'd estimate I'm roughly half-way through.
Comments
Maybe but consider the 890, a far inferior and cheaper radio that uses a M4?? I don't think the price of the MCU is really that important.
Marcus Dudley
2025-04-17 19:56:48 +0000 UTCI am guessing cutting corners is a requirement when your sales volume is in the hundreds of thousands or even millions and paying the developers $10/hour, I guess it was showing in the mess you had to sort out. But in the end we get a $30 radio that with proper firmware is just as good if not better than a $500 one.
RedJohn
2025-04-17 19:46:15 +0000 UTC
