D&D Court: Bonus Cases - Spiteful DMs, Abyssal Chicken Armies, and Joel's Rolls
Added 2025-10-17 22:29:14 +0000 UTCDungeon Court is back in session! Join Justices Murphy, Tanner and Axford, along with Bailiff Jake, as they pass judgement on your trials at the table!
CREDITS:
Sound Mixing and Editing by Trevor Lyon
Dungeon Court Theme Song by Sam Weiller
Comments
Buffalow blow is a top tier pun.
Sean Zenitram
2025-12-09 05:05:12 +0000 UTCThe TPK DM, case 2, should run a game for a bunch of kids as punishment.
Nitzan Harel
2025-11-10 11:24:25 +0000 UTCThe monk’s forever DM is CRAZY but the wording of flurry of blows is that immediately after you attack, you can use your bonus action to make the unarmed strikes, which isn’t that different than moving between multiple strikes on one attack action
Walker Thurman
2025-11-08 04:35:54 +0000 UTCTo anyone who thinks you can't enjoy gravity and levity simultaneously, all I have to say is "A Crown of Candy." Case in point.
J. Gro
2025-11-07 23:09:04 +0000 UTCI'm just guessing, but there may gave been a fundamental misunderstanding of what a "tank" is on the DM's part, in World of Warcraft and FF14, they're designed to draw aggro, be the target of ALL enemies and be able to survive, Dungeons and Dragons doesn't have these assumptions baked in, being turn based means the action economy can turn against them. There is no "taunt" in D&D besides Compelled Duel, and that doesn't actually force targets to choose you, it debuffs them if they pick someone else
Verdigree
2025-10-24 13:20:23 +0000 UTCit's times like Em saying that 20 abyssal chickens might be too strong for a 15th level character is what makes me scoff and them having power level discussions. SCOFF I say
Summer Tribe
2025-10-24 03:47:20 +0000 UTCReincars-mator'd*
Jonathan Goddard
2025-10-21 20:17:45 +0000 UTCWhat are you referring to in this episode? They've been doing this since early d&d court days, even across mixed bags and campaign short rests. Figured all the listeners had gotten used to it after 7 years lol The cases they picked for this episode are directly from the comments of the submission request post from a few days prior, so it definitely wasn't recorded the same day as the last d&d court
Kellyd
2025-10-21 04:34:29 +0000 UTCI don't enjoy breaking up the release of concurrently recorded DnD Courts. You guys treat them as one episode from a continuity of conversation POV, tightly referencing things that happened in the same recording session
Kevin Engelkamp
2025-10-21 02:44:29 +0000 UTC
