XaiJu
dtns
dtns

patreon


DTNS Research Note: Facebook, YouTube and Freebooting


Friday morning benjitek posted this on the DTNS blog:


This video by ‘In a Nutshell’ explains the effect to content providers by posting YouTube videos on Facebook much better than was done on this episode of DTNS. DTNS expressed unknowledgeable opinions, this video deals with facts: https://youtu.be/t7tA3NNKF0Q


So I thought I'd share with you my response (which is also posted on the DTNS blog). I hope some of you find this of interest.:


This video is a good explanation of how Facebook’s video views number is manipulated by Facebook, as well as the poor method for lodging a complaint. And we acknowledged that on the show.


It does not refute my point that if videos had not been uploaded to Facebook they would likely not have got all those views and therefore the views are not “stolen”


This is the same illogic used by record companies when they attempt to put dollar values on “stolen” digital downloads by assuming every single download would have been paid for otherwise.


-This Freakonomics article explains the problem with how to estimate the actual damage of music piracy: http://freakonomics.com/2012/01/12/how-much-do-music-and-movie-piracy-really-hurt-the-u-s-economy/


-This GAO report shows that most of the rhetoric claiming piracy losses were invented: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-423


In fact the video does point out the issue with Facebook’s autoplay causing a higher number because the view is not real. If the view is not real it’s another reason not to consider that view a “stolen” YouTube view.


The valid point is that Facebook prioritizes its video links.


Sometimes this kind of exposure even though unwelcome, can actually increase the original work.


Again this has been shown in torrent piracy.


This Motley Fool article describes several articles showing that illegal torrent downloads actually boosted sales by providing more exposure: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/06/13/does-online-piracy-help-boost-sales.aspx


Here’s more about the London School of Economics Study showing piracy was not harming entertainment industries: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/digital-piracy-not-harming-entertainment-industries-study-1.1894729


Is there data showing the general effect of popular “freebooted” videos on Facebook? Can we show that the original youtube videos get fewer views than expected? Or more? Or no effect? Without such data assuming they have a negative effect is unknowledgeable.


IN fact this quote from the In a Nutshell video:


“They’ve built their empire on stolen content and disregard for original content creators.”


is extraordinarily similar to Viacom’s accusation in court documents against YouTube in which they said YouTube founders made a "deliberate decision to build a business based on piracy."



In short, our comments about videos on Facebook were not ill-informed but very well informed, just different than your feelings. And that’s OK. All I ask is that if you disagree you refrain from name-calling and conduct an evidence-based discussion. It’s quite possible that you’re right and if you have some good information to back you up I’ll change my opinion. Until then I feel like some creators are (quite understandably) reacting emotionally the same way big media companies did to the rise of Bittorrent.


I also feel very strongly that we need to learn the lesson that the Internet is an infinitely copyable medium and any business model built on restricting that copying is destined to struggle against its own customers.


(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12701664)


All that said, THANK YOU. It’s challenging posts like this that keep us thinking about why we take the positions we do and that makes for a better show and better discourse in general.


Tom



Addendum:


BTW, linking to the video is not the most effective way to get this side of the debate out. Hank Green’s article is better researched and easier to consume if you’re not in a place to watch video


https://medium.com/@hankgreen/theft-lies-and-facebook-video-656b0ffed369#.9t3lchyfw

Comments

Great comments from all and thanks for continuing the discussion. Personally I still feel that plays on Facebook cannot be as easily equated with "lost views" as many of you claim. It's an assumption that re-posting replaces views but that just gets me repeating my arguments and we'll go round in circles. My overall point is that trying to restrict viewing on the Internet will always lead to these kinds of frustrations which is why I try to use copy ability as an advantage rather than something to fight against. Just my opinion of course.

Daily Tech News Show

I would have to disagree with the idea that this type of piracy is not very damaging to youtubers. A movie is usually easily recognizable. So, even with a torrent or a piece of the movie on youtube, the viewer probably still knows the origin of the video. However, the youtube market is very crowded. If someone stole my video and played it on youtube, nobody would know who I am. But yea, I could include my website and other information to inform them. But let's say that someone took a shot of my mill cutting some steel and uploaded that section of video to facebook. Then it seems like the uploader created that video and my channel or website would never be mentioned. Now, that's not to say that I, as a youtuber, can't do anything. I could watermark my videos, something that I actually see time from time. And I do agree that some of this hype is emotional. Youtubers have to put up with a ridiculously harsh algorithm that causes youtubers to lose money. So, to be under this harsh copyright rule, and see your material stollen is pretty disheartening. But considering the size of facebook, there's really no reason it should be this difficult to get stolen content down. And it really does seem like facebook is ignoring this problem to milk their numbers. But I should mention that my youtube channel is super small. So I never actually had this problem. Although, I have lost a couple of pennies because my videos were demonetized by the copyright algorithm. It was because I used stock music. So I can only relate to part of this copyright mess. And I feel that any unlawful use of copyrighted material is stealing. Doesn't matter if it is a small youtuber or a large corporation.

610Garage


More Creators