I feel like we skipped some really important conversations on the way to Artificial Intelligence stuff. I can think of all kinds of use cases for the technology that aren't weird and are cool, but man. It really seems like we skipped straight to a usurpation of labor with a machine that is, itself, based on stolen labor. This used to be an open question, or at any rate one that people used to discuss - is literally everything that people do and make in the public domain?But now that they're paying people for their stuff, very specific people, a Chosen Few, we can sorta put that to bed. Do YOU give money to people for no reason?!
Mike saw this image on Reddit, and lost it:

I think it can be considered roughly like painting by numbers. It occurs to me that there might be an interesting double entendre there, where the numbers are actually doing the painting in this case, but that's not what this is about! I need to focus. I'm just saying that we wouldn't say that a person who was using paint by numbers was engaging in laudatory behavior exactly. I think it's worth considering that the pipeline of artists we have now is the result of skill acquisition, and that's also where all the art comes from. We might be messing around with something really deep down when we automate things like this. Maybe people felt like this with the widespread adoption of the calculator. Like I said, there's a lot of really cool conversations to have around this and maybe I'm just not in the right places to see it. But it is entirely possible to make a silly comic about it!
Welcome to my coping strategy, I'll be your host,
(CW)TB
Grieger
2024-06-24 21:59:59 +0000 UTCChristopher Lefevre
2024-06-24 21:39:04 +0000 UTCZack Rhodes
2024-06-24 21:19:41 +0000 UTC