Lady W - SAGG'd to the MAXX
Added 2024-12-30 21:42:00 +0000 UTCThe poll was quite close for a bit - but ultimately ended with a solid lead for saggy. As such, this is now Nicola's canon form.
However, given the fairly close nature, I'm going to restrict this to Nicola, and will occasionally do "historical" photos of her pre-sag form.
Comments
`We need a new character! Big Pharma demands it! Maybe Saggy Susan or such,...not the iconic Nicola...π’
SinDD
2025-01-02 18:55:41 +0000 UTCLet's see how the poll goes. If sag wins, then saggy Nicola is default, but I'll do a new character (one of her society friends, we've seen them before) that has something like her old look. If no sag wins, then I'll do a new saggy character.
Xalynne
2024-12-31 15:16:05 +0000 UTCCan I alternatively suggest making a new character that circulates entirely on hyper-saggy breasts and just leaving Lady W the way that she is? That seems like a fair compromise.
Murble
2024-12-31 15:13:17 +0000 UTCI think it was fairly clear what was meant by #4, but this does make some sense. Here's what I'm going to do here - we'll poll again, and make it crystal clear. Whatever goes - goes.
Xalynne
2024-12-31 15:10:32 +0000 UTCI couldn't agree more. The fact that I'm not into this kind of stuff is one thing, but I think the poll itself was really not representative as the original question (whether Lady W should have saggy tits permanently or not) was pretty much compromised by option #4 that geared at something mostly unrelated as whether other characters should get this treatment too. This should have been an isolated poll, especially since option #4 did NOT explicitly state that the changes are to be permanent. In that regard, if only the three options actually geared at the original question would be there (#1 - #3), I assume that option #2 might have won, so the "saggy Lady W" would be just an alt and not the canon. Also, note that #3, which actually is the ONLY option explicitly saying that these changes are to be permanent, merely received 4% of the votes! Of course the creator always ultimately decides what he / she wants to do with her / his stuff, but when a poll to gather opinions from the patrons is created, it should always unmistakingly be narrowed down to one question with each option clearly stating what the consequences of them will be - which in case of option #4 it wasn't! This is what kind of bothers me right now. Also, the two newest pics show something that reinforces my stance why I dislike this look: The tattoos on her belly (particularly the tally marks) are now partially obscured by the saggy breasts, thus more or less reducing their existence to absurdity in the first place. Sorry to be this harsh, but I think that this is in so many ways a terrible decision. As an occasional alt, I wouldn't mind those pics at all, but them becoming canon β especially in regards to the "unbalanced" poll options β leave a very sour taste to the whole decision.
Sajanto
2024-12-31 14:58:48 +0000 UTCThe same for me, sad that this is the decision...
Wombat Steve
2024-12-31 01:10:40 +0000 UTCLike, I am now actively unattracted to the character.
Murble
2024-12-30 23:35:11 +0000 UTCObese with ultra saggy boobsπ€€
Mike
2024-12-30 23:06:36 +0000 UTCI still want to see lady w get fat, even if itβs just for one skit an obese lady w would be awsome
Mike
2024-12-30 23:06:19 +0000 UTCI honestly don't like this and Lady W was one of my favorite characters the way that she was.
Murble
2024-12-30 22:55:19 +0000 UTCDemocracy is wonderful god speed sag sluts
Nitaara Valrin
2024-12-30 22:30:41 +0000 UTCAwesome
Vincent
2024-12-30 22:14:30 +0000 UTCOh hell yeah
BigK7o8
2024-12-30 21:56:20 +0000 UTCPossibly? But temporary, yes.
Xalynne
2024-12-30 21:56:12 +0000 UTCBitchin
Almoondmilk
2024-12-30 21:54:31 +0000 UTCAw, no sag for Jess? Damn... Happy this is permanent for Lady W though. Would you be willing to do some temporary Jess sag though?
Moonflower
2024-12-30 21:52:11 +0000 UTCComplete with "Big Pharma" microscopic fine print side effects. The Master at work.
SumSkittles
2024-12-30 21:48:56 +0000 UTC
