OA803: Will Trump Get To Ditch Those Other 18 Losers Who Got Indicted With Him??
Added 2023-09-06 07:17:58 +0000 UTCOkay, so it's an all-Trump episode... but you won't want to miss Liz and Andrew breaking down whether Donald Trump can sever his case from his co-defendants in Fulton County, along with updates on the Trump DC case and the impending disbarment of Trump's little buddy and insurrectionist mastermind, John Eastman.
In the Patreon bonus, the duo update you on Day 1 of Trump lackey Pete Navarro's trial for failure to comply with the January 6th Committee's congressional subpoena.
This is a free post on Patreon!
Notes
Trump DC docket
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656595/united-states-v-trump
DOJ reply Opp Motion to Vacate
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.49.0.pdf
Perry DC Cir docket
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66700176/in-re-sealed-case/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Willis Motion to Advise Defendants
https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/2143/MOTION-08-31-2023-111043-39243051-4DD6F39C-4CF9-485F-B790-F0FC73AC40C5
Trump Motion to Sever
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23933074/23sc188947-motion-6.pdf
Jan 10 2021 Eastman email to Valerie Moon
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840.350.8_4.pdf
Liz Wonkette on Gohmert
https://www.wonkette.com/p/dumbest-man-in-congress-files-election-lawsuit-that-would-make-a-krakenhead-blush
Comments
Can we see Liz's conspiracy board for Yoddel Mountain?
Fame and fortune guaranteed in the state of Tintucky
2023-09-12 00:42:51 +0000 UTCHere's how it helps him: Trump can argue that he has a legal right to a trial later than Oct. 23, 2023 because he needs time to prepare for his defense. And right now DA Willis is pushing for an early trial date for all 19 defendants. I agree that the most likely outcome (as we'll talk about on today's show) is that Cheese & Sidney go on Oct. 23 and everyone else goes later, but this is still a significant unforced error by Willis IMO. I also think it makes it MORE likely that a conviction is reversed on appeal if the state makes any technical error in providing discovery, because Trump will argue that the motion itself was evidence of subjective bad faith.
Opening Arguments
2023-09-07 19:28:53 +0000 UTCLove the Blazing Saddles reference 😂😂😂
Charles Jones
2023-09-07 16:49:31 +0000 UTCSo glad you mentioned the Georgia protest arrests…I’d love context! Awesome today as always 😎
C’mon
2023-09-06 23:16:37 +0000 UTCLoved the ep, as always! I think you guys are blowing the denied willis motion out of proportion, however, at least when it comes to its potential impact on Trumps trial. I agree that looked at alone, it looks sloppy and bad. I saw it mainly as a Hail Mary attempt to fight off any future appeals based on speedy trial evidence not being provided. It was denied, though, so I don’t see how Trump can use that as reason to sever. I also don’t think it applies to trumps motion to sever, if he’s not also invoking his right to a speedy trial. Trump wants to sever specifically to AVOID speedy trial. The willis motion was talking about the speedy trial severers. I still don’t see a way that this single motion will help trump get a trial by himself.
Jawn Cur
2023-09-06 15:43:27 +0000 UTC
