I think it would be relevant. He's basically been charged with being of bad character. The witness is providing testimony that in nearly identical circumstances in the past, the defendant has shown very good character. It definitely isn't *proof* that the defendant is innocent, but it's something to factor in.
Help, I'm trapped in a podcast factory!
2020-06-05 19:07:43 +0000 UTC
Thinking B - “he didn’t steal other times” seems largely irrelevant
What do we want, time travel. When do we want it. That's Irrelevant!
2020-06-05 11:08:34 +0000 UTC