T3BE 197 - Full Question Text for Patrons
Added 2020-10-09 03:00:02 +0000 UTC
Comments
Well I completely wifted that one. For some reason I missed that the original was destroyed. I thought they just stopped showing it.
John of the bankruptcy pirates
2020-10-12 19:05:04 +0000 UTCI am changing my mind π I do think it is C for the same reasons above. The defendant denies the injuries were severe and the photo intends to prove that they were severe. But, it doesnβt prove negligence. Does the photo have to show that the defendant was negligent and the injuries were severe for it to be admissible? I think that may have tripped me up.
2020-10-10 14:03:27 +0000 UTCI think you need to produce the original video and that a photo would only be admissible if the original is unavailable. The idea that the news station doesn't show the image anymore doesn't prove that it was distroyed. The person would need to subpoena the news station. If the station refused claiming the original was distroyed then the photo may be admissible. So A The justification is chain of evidence and credibility of evidence. The photo of a newscast is less trustworthy than the original recording
John of the bankruptcy pirates
2020-10-09 22:17:31 +0000 UTC
