I'm also guessing C. Option A seems to put an unrealistic burden on the corporation, D seems to contradict the wording of the question. I could maybe see B, because I've heard "attractive nuisance" used when referring to homeowners being potentially liable if neighbor kids sneak onto their property and are injured playing with fun-looking stuff -- but the corporation is just "near" the daycare, and I don't think they'd have any reason to expect children to be wandering around unsupervised.
2019-10-05 02:46:26 +0000 UTC
Leaning to c
What do we want, time travel. When do we want it. That's Irrelevant!