June/July Poll Preview
Added 2020-06-06 16:33:07 +0000 UTCHello, everyone.
Here's a preview of the survey I'm planning to run from June 20: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeBoxsS6M-nconGaPA682kCJqfIhzdzp9w3OSjuk5Mwmcte1A/viewform?usp=sf_link
It's just a preview; any votes cast on it will be ignored. I'm doing this to get feedback before going online. So play with it a little choosing whatever. You can fill it multiple times too.
If your ideal picture cannot be assembled with the given types, variants, personalities, expressions and/or features, please propose changes before June 20. You can do this by PM'ing me or by commenting below. If we get enough character nominations, we can rewrite that list too.
I will post the actual poll on June 20. You will then have until June 30 to cast your votes. At the end of the month I will post a sketch claiming your pledges. I will publish the results on July 1st and proceed with the art grind.
Note that most of the multiple choice questions are checkboxes. You are free to vote for more than one option, but do be aware that most of them are still competing with each other.
Update 2020-06-08: Turned most questions optional, added "OCs welcomed" note, added "Ratio Cheat Sheet," "Ratio?" and "Anything specific you want the girl to be doing?" panels.
Comments
Thanks to you for being so receptive and thoughtful to your audience!
John Rikhter
2020-06-09 05:46:17 +0000 UTCYeah, I've noticed that people tend to get sketchy around my traditional overgrown hands and feet. I've been trying to gravitate away from them, though this usually entails just clipping the feet off-panel so I don't have to think about them. (The dropbox sketch is from 2016, by the way. I just added the ratios today.) With small hands I don't have too much trouble, but small feet look kind of dumb to my brain because they tend to appear like they would get crushed by the weight overhead. Still thinking about this. About the ratios, how about this: I will add some variants to the picture above, polish and post it as my June self-indulgent picture ("2" in my latest broadcast). It can then serve as a guide for people answering the survey from then on. I have already included the ratio question in the preview. Thank you very much for your feedback.
Nikhail
2020-06-09 04:42:07 +0000 UTCWow you're really great at this! Yes, ratio seems like a very good variant. Though considering your target I'd say that 0,71 is the starting point. Me, I'd like to see 5,5/7 = 0,78 and I'm curious as to how far you could stretch it while preserving the feminine shape (meaning, definitely not as far as 4). Also, would it be possible to add one more variant about hand, foot, wrist, ankle and waist size/thickness? I really dig the feminine extremities and waist you made for girl 0,42 which then explode dramatically in size for 0,78. I believe smaller hands, feet, wrists, ankles and waist applied to 0,78 would really benefit her overall sexiness. Perhaps that's just me of course.
John Rikhter
2020-06-08 18:22:22 +0000 UTCNo, please go ahead. I need feedback. There's no point in having a poll if it's not relevant to the commissioners filling it. Here's another idea: How about "ratio"? ie. width / height https://www.dropbox.com/s/zcpltlm8gleswt3/ratios.png?dl=0 And add some actually outrageous ones, such as 4... which would probably be just a nondescript mountain of muscle on the floor. Maybe this would force people to actually really think about it? How does this sound?
Nikhail
2020-06-08 14:49:07 +0000 UTCThe titanicness variant seems really nice, although my focus would be more on the proportions as you put it. I'd vote for a very tall or miniGTS girl (between 7' and 10') but with the proportions of a titan rather than a building/planetary sized height. I apologize for taking up too much of your time with my ramblings.
John Rikhter
2020-06-08 05:50:13 +0000 UTCYes. But. Pedantically speaking, that answer doesn't really mean much. The thing is, neither is tied to some contractual endsize. Her volume will always mostly depend on composition. A "Growth Sequence" only implies that she'll be bigger in each step. It doesn't automatically mean the girl will reach planetary sizes. A pin-up, on the other hand, is tied to aesthetics, of which size is one parameter of several. Then again, I'm a hypermuscle artist, so either way you can trust her build to be some definition of "are you fucking kidding me."
Nikhail
2020-06-07 15:12:11 +0000 UTCAbout the question on "variant", if I choose something different from Growth Sequence (sex/feat/pin-up) will the girl be as big as she would be at the end of the growth sequence?
John Rikhter
2020-06-07 14:23:05 +0000 UTC
